seal

Court Case Record The People v. Valdivia C082622 UID(2a02)


The People v. Valdivia Court Case Record

Court Case Number: C082622


 
Case NumberC082622
Case TitleThe People v. Valdivia
Case TypeCR
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address3rd Appellate District
Phone
Field Date
Close Date11/8/2017
Documentpdf

Parties

CounselNameType
Office of the State Attorney General
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Eric L. Christoffersen
Office of the Attorney General
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Matthew A. Kearney
Office of the State Attorney General
P. O. Box 944255
Sac

The PeoplePlaintiff and Respondent
Jyoti Malik
Attorney at Law
1296 E. Gibson Road, Suite A, #157
Woodland, CA 95776

Jose Alberto ValdiviaDefendant and Appellant
Central California Appellate Program
2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95833

Central California Appellate ProgramInformation only
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
07/27/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received (criminal). Filed in trial court 07/21/16. Corporal injury on spouse or cohabitant.
08/11/2016 Record on appeal filed. 1 vol. RT (10 pgs.), 1 vol. CT (68 pgs.). AOB due: 9/20/16.
08/11/2016 Letter sent to: Appellant regarding record being filed. AOB due: 9/20/16.
09/01/2016 Application/recommendation req. for counsel filed. For appellant.
09/01/2016 Counsel appointment order filed. Attorney Jyoti Malik for appellant. AOB due: 10/3/16.
10/03/2016 Filed application and order of: Appellant's opening brief. Due on 11/03/2016 By 31 Day(s) Appellant to 11/03/16
10/06/2016 Appellant's opening brief. Defendant and Appellant: Jose Alberto Valdivia Attorney: Jyoti Malik
11/03/2016 Filed application and order of: Respondent's brief. Due on 12/07/2016 By 30 Day(s) Respondent granting extension to 12/7/16 to file RB.
11/14/2016 Returned document for non-conformance. Respondent brief. Brief and service is defective for listing Modoc County Superior Court. The court should be Sacramento County Superior Court. Corrected brief and corrected service due: 12/07/16.
11/14/2016 Respondent's brief. Plaintiff and Respondent: The People Attorney: Eric L. Christoffersen
11/30/2016 Appellant's reply brief. Defendant and Appellant: Jose Alberto Valdivia Attorney: Jyoti Malik
11/30/2016 Case fully briefed.
06/27/2017 Argument order sent. Wednesday, August 23, 2107, at 9:30 a.m. Raye, P.J. Tentative Panel: Robie, Butz, Murray (Subject to change without notice)
06/30/2017 Argument advanced to: Monday, July 24, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Robie, Acting P.J.
07/03/2017 Filed letter from: Respondent advising Matthew Kerney will appear for oral argument.
07/03/2017 Request to continue oral argument - to court. by Respondent.
07/06/2017 Argument continued to: Wednesday, August 23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Robie, Acting P.J.
07/20/2017 Supplemental record/transcript filed. 1 vol. CT (11 pgs.).
07/20/2017 Letter sent advising that supplemental record has been filed.
08/23/2017 Cause argued and submitted. Jyoti Malik argued for def-appt Matthew A. Kearney, DAG, argued for plt-resp
09/12/2017 Change of address filed for: Attorney Matthew A. Kearney, DAG old phone: (916) 324-7590 new phone: (916) 210-7766 Pursuant to written notice from counsel.
11/08/2017 Opinion filed. (Signed Published) The order granting probation is modified by striking the probation condition requiring defendant to submit his "electronic storage devices, ... including but not limited to cell phones and computers, to the search and seizure by any law enforcement office or probation officer, any time of the day or night, with or without warrant, with or without his/her presence or further consent, " and to "provide access to any electronic storage devices and data contained there, including disclosing and providing any all information necessary to conduct a search." As modified, the order is affirmed. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Regarding electronic search conditions... (Concurring and dissenting opinion) Murray, J.
Disposition
Description: Affirmed in part and remanded with directions
Date: 11/08/2017
Disposition Type: Final The order granting probation is modified by striking the probation condition requiring defendant to submit his "electronic storage devices, ... including but not limited to cell phones and computers, to the search and seizure by any law enforcement office or probation officer, any time of the day or night, with or without warrant, with or without his/her presence or further consent," and to "provide access to any electronic storage devices and data contained there, including disclosing and providing any all information necessary to conduct a search." As modified, the order is affirmed. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Regarding electronic search conditions... Murray, J.
Publication Status: Signed Published
Author: Robie, Ronald B.
Participants: Butz, M. Kathleen (Concur) Murray, Jr., William J. (Dissent)
Case Citation: none