Court Case Record Ross v. Old Field Realty LLC B270777 UID(dc44)

Ross v. Old Field Realty LLC Court Case Record

Court Case Number: B270777

Case NumberB270777
Case TitleRoss v. Old Field Realty LLC
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address2nd Appellate District
Field Date
Close Date5/31/2017


Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis
Rand & Rand-Lewis, PLCs
5990 Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 630
Sherman Oaks, CA 91411-2523

Nichole Shavonne RossPlaintiff and Appellant

Old Field Realty LLCDefendant and Respondent

Jao C. MederiosDefendant and Respondent

Steve BrincaDefendant and Respondent
Consumer Law Section
Office of the Attorney General-Appellate Coordinator
300 South Spring Street
North Tower, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013

Contact Name: Consumer Law Section

Office of the District Attorney
210 W. Temple Street 18th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Bus. & Prof. Code 17209 / Rule 8.29Overview party
Presiding Judge
Honorable William F. Fahey
Los Angeles Superior Court
111 N. Hill St., Dept. 1
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Superior Court Los Angeles CountyOther
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
03/11/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Nichole Shavonne Ross 2/22/16
03/21/2016 Filing fee. check #796929 for Credit card for $775
03/28/2016 Default notice sent; no case information statement filed, or statement incomplete.
03/29/2016 Civil case information statement filed.
04/06/2016 Proceeding by 8.124 - no reporter's transcript. filed March 30, 2016
04/26/2016 Default notice received-appellant notified per rule 8.140(a)(1). filed March 9, 2016 failure to provide proof of service for the notice designating the record
04/26/2016 Email sent to: aplt counsel
04/27/2016 Email received from: aplt counsel per his TCW superior court they will vacate non-compliance/move up due to 5/2 to either file mrf or notice vacating non-compliance
04/29/2016 Default notice vacated. 4/28/2016 non-compliance issue on 4/6/2016
04/29/2016 Letter sent to counsel re: Appeal filed 2/22/2016 appears to be untimely filed; appellant has 15 days to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as filed untimely
05/03/2016 Email sent to: Re-sending April 29 letter with today's date(previous letter was dated 3/29)
05/18/2016 Requested - extension of time Appeal dismissed pursuant to:. Requested for 05/23/2016 By 5 Day(s)
05/18/2016 Granted - extension of time. Appeal dismissed pursuant to:. Due on 05/23/2016 By 5 Day(s) Granted to May 23, 2016 to file Response to OSC
05/23/2016 Response filed: by appellant dated 5/23/16 re: timeliness issue
07/13/2016 Letter sent to counsel re: On November 9, 2010 the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Timeliness in the above-entitled matter. The Court received and filed Appellants' Response on May 23, 2016. No Response or Opposition has been received from the Respondent. Having read and considered Appellant's Response and the available record, the Court finds that: a. The Notice of Appeal is timely filed pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.104(a) (2) from the December 22, 2015 order denying Appellant's Ex Parte Motion to Vacate Judgment and Enter Default Judgment. b. An order denying a statutory motion to vacate a judgment/order of dismissal is appealable pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ยง 9041(a) (2). The Order to Show Cause issued on November 9, 2010 is therefore discharged and this matter returned to active status in the Court. Appellant's request that the Notice of Appeal be deemed a Petition for Writ of Mandate is denied. Appellant's opening brief and appendix are due 30 days from the date of this letter.
08/10/2016 Granted - extension of time. Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Due on 10/12/2016 By 61 Day(s)
10/20/2016 Appellant notified re failure to timely file opening brief. due on 10/12/2016
11/01/2016 Appellant's opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Nichole Shavonne Ross Attorney: Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis No appendix, paper copies are due
11/03/2016 Appellant's appendix filed. 1 vol of AA paper copies of AOB received
12/15/2016 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent's brief.
12/15/2016 Letter sent to: Old Field Realty LLC informed that it is without counsel and that counsel must be retained before proceeding in the appeal.
01/18/2017 Case on ready list; no reply by respondent to notice re failure to file brief. Defendant and Respondent: Old Field Realty LLC Defendant and Respondent: Jao C. Mederios Defendant and Respondent: Steve Brinca
Description: Dismissed by opinion
Date: 05/31/2017
Disposition Type: Final The appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. 4 pgs./Rothschild-Chaney-Johnson.
Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
Author: Rothschild, Frances
Participants: Johnson, Jeffrey W. (Concur) Chaney, Victoria Gerrard (Concur)
Case Citation: none