seal

Court Case Record WILSON FARM BUSINESS TRUST vs. PATRIOT COMMUNITY BANK & another 2013-J-0210 UID(ee86)


WILSON FARM BUSINESS TRUST vs. PATRIOT COMMUNITY BANK & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0210


 
Case Number2013-J-0210
Case TitleWILSON FARM BUSINESS TRUST vs. PATRIOT COMMUNITY BANK & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date05/30/2013
Close Date05/31/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
William J. Dailey, Jr., EsquireWilson Farm Business TrustPlaintiff/Respondent
Alan A. Wrigley, EsquirePatriot Community BankDefendant
James E. Neyman, EsquireMarchegay TechnologiesDefendant/Petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
05/30/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by Marchegay Technologies (Marchegay S.A.S.).
05/30/2013 #2 Request to file an eighteen page memorandum in support of its petition for interlocutory review, filed by Marchegay Technologies (Marchegay S.A.S.).
05/31/2013 #3 Letter from Attorney James E. Neyman re: Errata.^
05/31/2013 RE#2: Allowed. *Notice
05/31/2013 RE#3: Noted. *Notice.
05/31/2013 RE#1: To the extent defendant Marchegay Technologies seeks review of the trial court's allowance of plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to G.L. c. 231, §. 118 (par. 2) as stated in the petition, the proper avenue of review of such an order under that paragraph is by filing a notice of appeal in the trial court. See G.L. c. 231, s. 118 (par. 2). To the extent defendant inadvertently referenced paragraph 2 and seeks review by the single justice pursuant to paragraph 1, after review, the petition is denied (Kantrowitz, J.). Notice/attest/Curran, J.