seal

Court Case Record Tan v. Summers et al. A151128 UID(c172)


Tan v. Summers et al. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: A151128


 
Case NumberA151128
Case TitleTan v. Summers et al.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address1st Appellate District
Phone
Field Date02/14/2017
Close Date6/1/2018
Documentpdf

Parties

CounselNameType
Arthur Junguo Liu
Inter-Pacific Law Group Inc.
324 10th Street, Suite 223
Oakland, CA 94612
Ricardo SummersDefendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant

Alejandro GomezDefendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant
Daniel Alfred Conrad
1550 Bryant Street - Suite 760
San Francisco, CA 94103
Wan Fen TanPlaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent
Docket
Date Description Notes
04/26/2017 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Filed 2/14/2017 by Arthur J. Liu, counsel for Defendants/Cross-Complainants
04/26/2017 Notified parties of local rules and procedures.
04/26/2017 Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).
04/27/2017 Civil case information statement filed. Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Ricardo Summers Attorney: Arthur Junguo Liu Order attached.
04/28/2017 Filing fee. cc by phone
05/15/2017 Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 2/24/2017, designating CT, does not indicate if proceeding with or without RT
05/15/2017 Respondent's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 3/2/2017, designating CT
05/15/2017 Received default notice 8.121(a) designation not filed. Dated: 5/10/2017, Pursuant to CRC Rule(b)(1)(c), the notice designating record on appeal must specify whether the appellant elects to proceed with or without a record of the oral proceedings.
05/17/2017 Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: AMENDED 5/15/2017, designating CT without RT
10/23/2017 Record on appeal filed. C-1
12/01/2017 Appellant's opening brief. Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Ricardo Summers Attorney: Arthur Junguo Liu
12/13/2017 Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by: Appellant
12/21/2017 Stipulation of extension of time filed to: Respondent's brief. Due on 02/27/2018 By 56 Day(s)
01/30/2018 Motion to dismiss filed (after record). Motion to Dismiss Appeal; Supporting Memorandum
02/13/2018 Opposition filed. Oppositon to Motion to Dismiss
02/13/2018 To court. Motion to dismiss and opposition
02/20/2018 Order filed. BY THE COURT: Respondent Wan Fen Tan has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that appellants (1) seek judicial review of a determination the trial court did not make and (2) do not challenge any aspect of the appealed-from order. The motion is denied. (See People ex rel. Lockyer v. Brar (2004) 115 Cal./app.4th 1315, 1319 [power to dismiss "must be used with extreme rarity, " particularly where assessment of appeal's merits is required].)
02/26/2018 Respondent's brief. Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent: Wan Fen Tan Attorney: Daniel Alfred Conrad
02/27/2018 Filed proof of service. Proof of service for Respondent's Brief to San Francisco Superior Court
04/04/2018 ARB not filed (time elapsed or notice no brief).
04/04/2018 ARB not filed (time elapsed or notice no brief). Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Ricardo Summers Attorney: Arthur Junguo Liu
04/04/2018 Case fully briefed.
Disposition
***** *****
Description: Reversed in full
Date: 06/01/2018
Disposition Type: Final The trial court's January 2017 order is reversed. Summers and Gomez are awarded their costs.
Publication Status: Signed Published
Author: Humes, James M.
Participants: Banke, Kathleen M. (Concur) Margulies, Sandra Lynn (Concur)
Case Citation: none