seal

Court Case Record THIS CASE CONTAINS IMPOUNDED MATERIAL OR PID SJ-2018-0133 UID(825d)


THIS CASE CONTAINS IMPOUNDED MATERIAL OR PID Court Case Record

Court Case Number: SJ-2018-0133


 
Case NumberSJ-2018-0133
Case TitleTHIS CASE CONTAINS IMPOUNDED MATERIAL OR PID
Case Type
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyHampden
CourtHampden Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date03/26/2018
Close Date04/13/2018

Parties

CounselNameType
James Goodhines, EsquireJose Polaco-Morales Defendant/Petitioner
Katherine E. McMahon, Assistant District Attorney John Wendel, Assistant District AttorneyCommonwealth Plaintiff/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/26/2018 Case entered.
03/26/2018 #1 MOTION to Waive Filing Fee, filed for Jose Polaco-Morales by Atty. James R. Goodhines.
03/26/2018 #2 Affidavit of Indigency of Jose Polaco-Morales, filed by Atty. James R. Goodhines.
03/26/2018 #3 Appearance of Counsel for Jose Polaco-Morales, filed by Atty. James R. Goodhines.
03/26/2018 #4 Defendant's Application to Single Justice for Leave to Appeal Denial of Motion to Suppress with Certificate of Service, Memorandum of Law, and Attachments A-M , filed for Jose Polaco-Morales by Atty. James R. Goodhines.
03/26/2018 Fee Waiver ALLOWED by Judge. (Cypher, J.)
03/30/2018 #5 Defendant's MOTION To Enlarge Time To File Defendant's Notice Of Appeal And Application For Interlocutory Appeal Late with Affidavit and Certificate of Service filed by Atty. James Goodhines. (SEE PAPER #7)
04/09/2018 #6 Commonwealth's Opposition to Defendant's Mass. R. Crim. P. 15(a)(2) (2017) & G. L. c. 278, ยง28E Petition Seeking Leave to Appeal an Order Denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Seized without a Warrant filed with Certificate of Service and Appendix, filed by John A. Wendel, A.D.A..
04/12/2018 Under advisement. (Gants, C.J.).
04/13/2018 #7 ORDER: ... "it is ORDERED that the defendant's motion to enlarge time to file notice of appeal and application for interlocutory appeal late be, and hereby is, ALLOWED. ... I conclude that interlocutory appeal of the the denial of the motion to suppress at issue will not advance the administration of justice. The defendant, if he were to be convicted, must wait final disposition before seeking full appellate review, where the appellate court will have the benefit of considering together this motion and any appellate issues that arise at trial. For the above reasons, it is ORDERED that the defendant's application id DENIED." (Gants, C.J.)
04/17/2018 #8 Notice to counsel/parties, regarding paper #7 filed.