seal

Court Case Record THEODORE L. STARR vs. MILLS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION INC & another 2012-J-0339 UID(c845)


THEODORE L. STARR vs. MILLS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION INC & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0339


 
Case Number2012-J-0339
Case TitleTHEODORE L. STARR vs. MILLS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION INC & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date09/12/2012
Close Date12/17/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Ellen Rappaport-Tanowitz, EsquireTheodore L. StarrPlaintiff/Petitioner
Peter Kachajian, EsquireMills Construction Corporation IDefendant/Respondent
Peter Kachajian, EsquireNeil CrothersDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
09/12/2012 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by Theodore L. Starr.^
09/20/2012 #2 Motion to stay arbitration pending review of petition for interlocutory review, filed by Theodore L. Starr.
09/25/2012 #3 Motion to extend time to answer petition for interlocutory review, filed by Mills Construction Corporation Inc, & Neil Crothers.
09/26/2012 #4 RE#2: Allowed. The Order of the Superior Court, entered on August 13, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to stay arbitration, is stayed, as is any continuation of arbitration of the underlying dispute, pending review by the Single Justice of the plaintiff's petition filed on September 12, 2012, and until further order of the Court. (Hanlon, J.). *Notice/Attest/Kirpalani, J.
09/26/2012 #5 RE#3: Allowed to 10/9/12. (Hanlon, J.). *Notice
10/03/2012 #6 Letter from Diane Lawton, Special Assistant Attorney General re: amicus letter n support of the plaintiff. ^
10/15/2012 #7 Opposition to Motion to Stay, filed by Theodore L. Starr. ^
10/17/2012 ORDER: The defendant has filed a petition, pursuant to G. L. c. 231, ยง 118 (first par.), seeking review of an order of the Middlesex Superior Court (No. MICV2012-02582; Kirpilani, J.), in which the court denied his Motion for an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order Seeking Stay of Arbitration Pending Litigation. In light of the fact that the parties have made conflicting representations to this court about the underlying facts in the case, (e.g. whether the contract in fact contained certain language), the matter is remanded to the motion judge for findings of fact and rulings of law, to be made on or before November 20, 2012. (Hanlon, J.).*Notice/Attest/Kirpalani, J.
12/13/2012 Status report, filed by Theodore L. Starr. ^
12/17/2012 RE#7: As it appears that the petitioner has obtained the relief sought from the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed. *Notice/Attest/Kirpalani, J.