seal

Court Case Record SHERRY WALKER vs. LAWRENCE WATSON 2012-J-0210 UID(502b)


SHERRY WALKER vs. LAWRENCE WATSON Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0210


 
Case Number2012-J-0210
Case TitleSHERRY WALKER vs. LAWRENCE WATSON
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk Probate & Family
CourtSuffolk Probate & Family
Court Address
Phone
Field Date06/06/2012
Close Date06/21/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Sherry V. Smith, EsquireSherry WalkerPlaintiff/Respondent
Lawrence WatsonPro Se Defendant/Petitioner
Martin F. Kane, II, EsquireMartin F. KaneGuardian ad litem
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
06/06/2012 #1 Motion to waive entry fee, filed by Lawrence Watson, is allowed.
06/06/2012 #2 Motion to file late appeal under M.G.L. c. 231, s 118, filed by Lawrence Watson.
06/12/2012 #3 RE#2: The petitioner's motion seeking to enlarge the time for filing a petition for relief under G. L. 231 s. 118 is denied because the Single Justice does not have the authority to enlarge the thirty-day filing period prescribed by the statute. See G. L. c. 231, s. 118 (first par.). Even were the petition timely, it would be denied on the ground that it does not seek appropriate Single Justice relief (Wolohojian, J.). Notice/attest
06/14/2012 #4 Notice of appeal, filed by Lawrence Watson.^
06/21/2012 ORDER: The petitioner Lawrence Watson has filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal," which could be stricken because Watson has no right of appeal from the denial of relief he sought pursuant to G. L. c. 231, s. 118. However, I choose to treat the Watson's filing as a motion for reconsideration of my order of June 12, 2012. That motion is allowed only to the limited extent of permitting Watson to file a late notice of appeal from the denial of his motion to stay execution (Entry # 422 in Watson v. Walker, SU03W-0810PA1). Watson's Notice of Appeal must be filed no later than June 28, 2012. The motion for reconsideration is otherwise denied because: (1) Entry #421 and Entry #423 are interlocutory rulings relating to the pending criminal contempt complaint; (2) Entry #424 and Entry #427 allowed Watson his requested relief; (3) Entry #425 and Entry #426 appear to be rulings under G. L. c. 261. S. 27C and any appeal therefrom is untimely. (Wolohojian, J.) *Notice/Attest.