seal

Court Case Record SCHOOL COMMITTEE TEWKSBURY & another vs. TEWKSBURY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION 2010-J-0184 UID(c908)


SCHOOL COMMITTEE TEWKSBURY & another vs. TEWKSBURY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2010-J-0184


 
Case Number2010-J-0184
Case TitleSCHOOL COMMITTEE TEWKSBURY & another vs. TEWKSBURY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date04/09/2010
Close Date04/20/2010

Parties

CounselNameType
Joshua Coleman, EsquireSchool Committee TewksburyPlaintiff/Petitioner
Joshua Coleman, EsquireSupt. of SchoolsPlaintiff/Petitioner
Ira C. Fader, EsquireTewksbury Teachers AssociationDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
04/09/2010 #1 PETITION purs to GLc 231, s. 118 w/attach, filed by School Committee Tewksbury and Supt. of Schools.
04/14/2010 #2 ORDER: "...To the extent that the plaintiffs want the current filing fee treated as a petition for interlocutory review, and not as an (improperly filed) appeal filed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, Sec. 118 (second par.), they shall file a notice to that effect with the clerk by 5:00 p.m., april 16, 2010 (with service to the defendants). To the extent that the plaintiffs actually intend to pursue an appeal pursuant to G. L. c. 231, Sec 118 (second par.) (in addition to or instead of a petition for interlocutory relief), they should follow the procedures set forth in Mass. R. App. P. 4." (Milkey, J.) *Notice/attest/image/Chernoff, J.
04/14/2010 #3 RESPONSE of Tewksbury Teachers Association to Plaintiff's Petition.
04/16/2010 #4 Letter from Michael J. Long and Joshua Coleman re: Request to amend petition as filed pursuant to Chapter 231 Section 118 par. 1.
04/16/2010 #5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "...Originally, the petition was denominated "an interlocutory appeal pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, S118, par. 2"...the plaintiffs clarified that they wanted the filing treated as a petition for interlocutory relief...I need not resolve the precise extent to which the School Committee has demonstrated a likelihood of success, because it has simply not made a convincing showing why the arbitration process needs to be enjoined...Petition denied." (Milkey, J.) *Notice/Attest/Chernoff, J./Image.