seal

Court Case Record Richard Dragone & another vs. Claudio Santini & others 2011-J-0053 UID(9676)


Richard Dragone & another vs. Claudio Santini & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-J-0053


 
Case Number2011-J-0053
Case TitleRichard Dragone & another vs. Claudio Santini & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date02/09/2011
Close Date02/15/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Sean M. Beagan, EsquireRichard DragonePlaintiff/Respondent
Sean M. Beagan, EsquireMichele DragonePlaintiff/Respondent
Philip D. Moran, EsquireClaudio SantiniDefendant/Petitioner
Philip D. Moran, EsquireFrances SantiniDefendant/Petitioner
Philip D. Moran, EsquireMichael SantiniDefendant
Eric R. Barber-Mingo, Esquire Dori F. Chadbourne, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyAnnielu SantiniDefendant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
02/09/2011 #1 PETITION purs to GLc 231, s. 118 w/attach, filed by Claudio Santini and Frances Santini.
02/15/2011 #2 ORDER: RICHARD DRAGONE & another(1) vs. CLAUDIO SANTINI & others.(2) "Notwithstanding the fact that money damages are sought, the judge could reasonably have concluded that, absent injunctive relief, the continued existence of the check cashing business was in jeopardy. See Hull Mun. Lighting Plant v. Mass. Munic. Wholesale Elec. Co., 399 Mass. 640, 643 (1987). Given the allegations contained in the verified complaint and affidavits as well as the supporting documents proffered by the plaintiffs, we discern neither error or law nor abuse of discretion warranting correction in the judge's determination, following review, that injunctive relief as ordered was appropriate. The petition is denied." (Lenk, J.). Notice/Attest/Image Footnotes (1) Michele Dragone (2) Frances Santini; Michael Santini; and Annielu Santini.
02/17/2011 #3 Opposition to #1 filed by Richard Dragone and Michele Dragone.
02/18/2011 RE#3: No action necessary as the petition was denied on 2-15-11. Notice