seal

Court Case Record RICHARD SARRO & others vs. SANDRA CIANCARELLI & others 2014-P-0230 UID(3d43)


RICHARD SARRO & others vs. SANDRA CIANCARELLI & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2014-P-0230


 
Case Number2014-P-0230
Case TitleRICHARD SARRO & others vs. SANDRA CIANCARELLI & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date07/10/2007
Close Date01/12/2016

Parties

CounselNameType
Stephen J. Kuzma, Esquire India L. Minchoff, EsquireRichard SarroPlaintiff/Appellee
Stephen J. Kuzma, Esquire India L. Minchoff, EsquireEdward SarroPlaintiff/Appellee
Stephen J. Kuzma, EsquireJoanne SarroPlaintiff/Appellee
Leonard M. Davidson, EsquireSandra CiancarelliDefendant/Appellant
Leonard M. Davidson, Esquire Jerry E. Benezra, EsquireEdward CiancarelliDefendant
Leonard M. Davidson, Esquire Jerry E. Benezra, EsquireJennifer NoyerDefendant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/28/2014 #1 **** Cross Appeal ****
02/19/2014 #2 Entered.
02/19/2014 #3 Notice of entry sent.
03/03/2014 #4 Docketing Statement received from Sandra Ciancarelli^
03/12/2014 #5 Motion to docket appeal late, filed by Richard Sarro, Edward Sarro, Joanne Sarro.
03/18/2014 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Sandra Ciancarelli.
03/19/2014 #7 RE#3: Allowed. The plaintiffs may docket their appeals by payment of the appropriate fee ($900) on or before 3/31/14. Upon entry, pursuant to MRAP 16(i), the plaintiffs would be deemed appellants for the purposes of briefing and their brief would be due 40 days after entry of their appeal, unless the plaintiff's payment of the entry fee is accompanied by an agreement between the parties as to an alternate designation for briefing purposes, including a proposed brief due date for the appellants' brief. (Wolohojian, J.). *Notice/Attest.
03/20/2014 #8 RE#4: Allowed to 04/30/2014. Notwithstanding the court's order of 3/19/14. Notice sent.
03/28/2014 #9 Additional docket fee in the amount of $600 received from Stephen J. Kuzma, Esquire.
04/30/2014 #10 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Richard Sarro, Joanne Sarro
05/01/2014 #11 RE#6: Allowed to 05/15/2014. Notice sent.
05/06/2014 #12 REVISED ACTION RE#6: Allowed to 06/15/2014. In the future, rather than requests merely a certain number of days, counsel should also provide a date certain for the filing of the brief. Notice sent.
06/03/2014 #13 MOTION to withdraw appeal, filed by Richard Sarro, Edward Sarro, Joanne Sarro.
06/04/2014 #14 RE#7: The motion to withdraw appeal is denied without prejudice to refiling as a stipulation of dismissal of the appeal pursuant to MRAP 29(b) and signed by all parties or counsel. *Notice.
06/17/2014 #15 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
07/03/2014 #16 Motion to vacate dismissal for failure to prosecute and request for the entry of a voluntary dismissal, filed by Edward Sarro.
07/09/2014 #17 OPPOSITION to paper #8, filed by Sandra Ciancarelli, Edward Ciancarelli, Jennifer Noyer.
07/10/2014 #18 Response to paper #9, filed by Edward Sarro & Joanne Sarro.
07/28/2014 #19 RE#8: No action is necessary on the motion to vacate dismissal; the appeal has not yet been dismissed for failure to prosecute. Notice preceding dismissal did appropriately issue. Nevertheless, appellate proceedings are stayed to 8/4/14 by when the appellees are to file a status report regarding whether they will assent to a dismissal of the appeal with prejudice and without an award of costs. If the appellees are unanimous that they do wish to have the appeal dismissed under those conditions, in lieu of a status report, the parties may file a stipulation of dismissal which simply states that the parties agree that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice and without an award of cost to be signed by all of the parties or their attorneys. *Notice.
08/08/2014 #20 Stipulation of dismissal, filed by Richard Sarro, Edward Sarro, Joanne Sarro, Sandra Ciancarelli, Edward Ciancarelli, Jennifer Noyer^
08/11/2014 #21 RE#11: Approved as to appellants Ricard Sarro and Joanne Sarro only. Said appeal dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to any party, pursuant to M.R.A.P. 29(b). The defendant/cross-appellant Sandra Ciancarelli shall now be designated as Appellant with her brief and appendix due on or before 9-22-14. It is noted that an appeal on behalf of Edward Sarro was never entered. Notice/Attest.
08/27/2014 #22 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Sandra Ciancarelli.