seal

Court Case Record RENCO CORPORATION vs. SUESAN SOKOLOSKY RANDLETT & others 2014-J-0419 UID(9bc3)


RENCO CORPORATION vs. SUESAN SOKOLOSKY RANDLETT & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2014-J-0419


 
Case Number2014-J-0419
Case TitleRENCO CORPORATION vs. SUESAN SOKOLOSKY RANDLETT & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyEssex
CourtEssex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date10/17/2014
Close Date12/01/2015

Parties

CounselNameType
Roy D. Toulan, Jr., EsquireRenco CorporationPlaintiff/Petitioner
Richard C. Bardi, EsquireSuesan Sokolosky RandlettDefendant/Respondent
Richard C. Bardi, EsquireDavid Candell HunterDefendant/Respondent
Richard C. Bardi, EsquireGammasupplies LLCDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
10/17/2014 #1 Appeal entered pursuant to M.G.L.c. 231, § 6(G) with attachments^
10/21/2014 #2 ORDER: The above-captioned matter is an appeal from an order under G. L. c. 231, sec. 6G. Action on the within is stayed pending plenary review of the underlying case, currently awaiting assembly in the trial court . See Bailey v Shriberg, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 277, 282 (1991). The petitioner is to file a status report in this case when the plenary appeal is docketed. Notice/attest/Lang, J.
11/16/2015 #3 Status report, filed by Renco Corporation^
12/01/2015 ORDER: Based on the record before this court, the single justice concludes that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated that all, or substantially all, of the defenses asserted by defendant were wholly unsubstantial, frivolous, and not advanced in good faith. Accordingly, the order dated September 11, 2014, which denied any award pursuant to G. L. c. 2231, § 6F, is affirmed. (Katzmann, J.). *Notice/Attest/Lang, J.