seal

Court Case Record Paprock et al. v. First Transit, Inc. D069748 UID(8bc0)


Paprock et al. v. First Transit, Inc. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: D069748


 
Case NumberD069748
Case TitlePaprock et al. v. First Transit, Inc.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address4th Appellate District Division 1
Phone
Field Date
Close Date2/15/2017
Documentpdf

Parties

CounselNameType
James Kostas
Huffman & Kostas
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

Sheldon A. Ostroff
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

George E. Fleming
Fleming PC
4225 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 92037

Martin Neb

Bernie PaprockPlaintiff and Respondent
James Kostas
Huffman & Kostas
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

Sheldon A. Ostroff
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

George E. Fleming
Fleming PC
4225 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 92037

Martin Neb

Teah NelsonPlaintiff and Respondent
James Kostas
Huffman & Kostas
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

Sheldon A. Ostroff
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

George E. Fleming
Fleming PC
4225 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 92037

Martin Neb

Pamela HastingsPlaintiff and Respondent
James Kostas
Huffman & Kostas
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

Sheldon A. Ostroff
1441 State Street
San Diego, CA 92101

George E. Fleming
Fleming PC
4225 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 92037

Martin Neb

Mancha OverstreetPlaintiff and Respondent
David J Dow
Littler & Mendelson
501 W. Broadway, Ste. 900
San Diego, CA 92101-3577

Theodore R. Scott
Littler Mendelson, APC
501 West Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101-3577

First Transit, Inc.Defendant and Respondent
Mark Yablonovich
Law Offices of Mark Yablonovich
1875 Century Park East; Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Eric P. ClarkeMovant and Appellant
Office of the Attorney General
P. O. Box 85266
San Diego, CA 92186-5266

Office Of The District Attorney
Appellate Division
P. O. Box X-1011
San Diego, CA 92112

The PeopleOther
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
02/11/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Filed on February 8, 2016 by Eric P. Clarke
02/11/2016 Appellate package sent.
02/17/2016 Filing fee. From Superior Court
02/18/2016 Request for judicial notice filed. Respondent. Docs. attached.
02/18/2016 Motion filed. Respondents' motion for summary affirmance or dismissal of appeal
02/22/2016 Errata filed to: Respondent Paprocks' errata to motion for summary affirmance
02/25/2016 Received default notice 8.121(a) designation not filed. Dated: 2/22/16
02/26/2016 Application filed. Appellant's application for EOT to file opposition to motion.
03/01/2016 Order filed. Appellant's request for an extension of time to file opposition to the motion for summary affirmance of the order being appealed is GRANTED. Appellant must file and serve his opposition on or before March 18, 2016.
03/09/2016 Default notice sent; no case information statement filed, or statement incomplete.
03/17/2016 Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript. Filed on 3/4/16
03/22/2016 Civil case information statement filed. Clarke 2/26
03/22/2016 Opposition filed. To motion for summary affirmance
03/22/2016 Request for judicial notice filed. Appellant Clark. Docs. attached.
03/24/2016 Reply filed Respondents' Reply to opposition to motion for summary affirmance
04/05/2016 Notice to reporter to prepare transcript. CSR's, Shoaff: 11/4/15, Bryant: 12/3/15
04/21/2016 Order filed. Respondents' motion for summary affirmance or to dismiss the appeal is denied without prejudice to any party raising the same issues or arguments in the party's merits brief after the record on appeal is transmitted to this court. Based on the violations of the California Rules of Court in the briefing in support of and in opposition to the motion, however, the parties are put on notice that the California Rules of Court's requirements regarding citations in briefs - in particular, rule 8.204(a)(1)(C)'s requirement that all factual and procedural assertions be supported by accurate record references, and rule 8.1115's requirement that unpublished opinions "may not be cited" except as "relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel" - will be strictly enforced. The parties' requests for judicial notice in support of and in opposition to the motion are denied as moot. Through disposition of this appeal, absent an exceptional showing of good cause, the court will not approve any unstipulated request for an extension of time of any deadline or hearing.
06/01/2016 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT FILED*** Clerk's rule 8.124 and Reporter's RT-2/51pgs.
07/21/2016 Appellant notified re failure to timely file opening brief.
08/03/2016 APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED. Movant and Appellant: Eric P. Clarke Attorney: Mark Yablonovich AA-2/258pgs.
08/03/2016 Certificate of interested entities and parties filed by: Movant and Appellant: Eric P. Clarke Attorney: Mark Yablonovich CIP in Brief
08/31/2016 Association of attorneys filed for: Respondent Paprock et al.

Last Viewed