seal

Court Case Record PETER J. CHONGARLIDES, SR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECT & others 2011-J-0025 UID(a94a)


PETER J. CHONGARLIDES, SR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECT & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-J-0025


 
Case Number2011-J-0025
Case TitlePETER J. CHONGARLIDES, SR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECT & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/20/2011
Close Date01/20/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Peter J. Chongarlides, Sr.Pro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireCommissioner of CorrectDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireSuperintendents M.C.I. NorfolkDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireDouglas L. BowerDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireWilliam L. DriscollDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireKristie LadouceurDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireJoseph McGreevyDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireJohn SilvaDefendant/Respondent
Tabitha M. Schneider, EsquireRobert StorkDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/20/2011 #1 Motion to to proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Peter J. Chongarlides, Sr.
01/20/2011 #2 RE#1: Putting aside the qurestion of indigency, the petition is entered this date without fee. (Sikora, J.)
01/20/2011 #3 Motion to enlargement of time, filed by Peter J. Chongarlides, Sr.
01/20/2011 #4 PETITION pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attach, filed by Peter J. Chongarlides, Sr.
01/20/2011 RE#2: Denied. See action of this date on paper #3. (Sikora, J.) *Notice/Attest.
01/20/2011 RE#3: DENIED. The petition is fatally late. It lies well beyond the thirty-day time limitation imposed by G. L. c. 231, § 118, first paragraph. The Appeals Court therefore does not have jurisdiction to entertain it. (Sikora, J.) *Notice/Attest.
03/14/2011 Letter from Peter J. Chongarlides, Sr. re: request to correct the error.
03/25/2011 RE#4: A review of Superior Court docket no. SUCV2009-03117 shows that final judgment has yet to enter in that matter. The filing of a notice appeal from an interlocutory order does not preserve the filer's right of review of the order before the single justice. Pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, a petition must be filed in the Appeals Court within thirty days of the entry of the order, along with the appropriate fee or motion to waive the fee. As indicated in the Order, dated 1/20/11, no petition was filed within the specified time period, and therefore the petition was denied. At the entry of final judgment in this matter, and after the filing of a notice of appeal within thirty days of the entry of the judgment, the orders in question may be reviewed on plenary appeal by a panel of this court. Notice/attest/Lauriat, J.