Court Case Record PAULA MALONE & another vs. SEAN P. SIMMONS 2013-J-0553

PAULA MALONE & another vs. SEAN P. SIMMONS Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0553

Case Number2013-J-0553
Case TitlePAULA MALONE & another vs. SEAN P. SIMMONS
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyNorfolk Probate & Family
CourtNorfolk Probate & Family
Court Address
Field Date12/18/2013
Close Date01/28/2014


Jeremy T. Robin, EsquirePaula MalonePlaintiff/Petitioner
Jeremy T. Robin, EsquireThomas Malone SimmonsPlaintiff/Petitioner
Sydney S. Milgram, EsquireSean P. SimmonsDefendant/Respondent
Robert L. Johnson, EsquireCaitlin Malone SimmonsOther/respondent
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
12/18/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by Paula Malone, & Thomas Malone Simmons.
12/18/2013 #2 ORDER: The petitioner is to forthwith transmit the following documents in the above-captioned matter: 1) a copy of the order allowing respondent leave to file a motion to dismiss, and any motion filed in support thereof; 2) pages 2-5 of Exhibit 3; 3) a current copy of the trial court docket entries, and any other relevant papers filed in the trial court. See Standing Order Concerning Petitions to the Single Justice. Notice
12/26/2013 #3 Opposition to Petition with attachments, filed by Sean P. Simmons. ^
12/30/2013 #4 RE#1: Action on the petition is stayed pending petitioner's compliance with the materials requested on the order of 12/18/13. *Notice/Attest/Phelan, J.
12/31/2013 #5 The entire Exhibit 3 document, and trial docket sheet, filed by Paula Malone, & Thomas Malone Simmons.^
01/17/2014 REVISED ACTION RE#1: On the record presented to this Court, it is not possible to discern whether the trial court judge abused his discretion when he denied the petitioner's motion to amend their petition to modify the guardianship. This matter is remanded to the trial court so that the judge may enter written findings regarding denial of the motion to amend, no later than 2/7/14. (Grainger, J.) *Notice/Attest.
01/27/2014 Written findings on the denial of the Petitioner's Motion to amend the Petition for Guardianship received from Norfolk Probate and Family Court^
01/28/2014 ORDER: The trial court judge's thoughtful and well-reasoned memorandum demonstrates that there was no error of law or abuse of discretion. The plaintiffs' petition (#1) is denied. (Grainger, J.) . *Notice/Attest/Phelan, J.