seal

Court Case Record PAUL D. DOHERTY & others vs. TOWN OF ASHLAND & others 2013-P-0877 UID(f0f4)


PAUL D. DOHERTY & others vs. TOWN OF ASHLAND & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-P-0877


 
Case Number2013-P-0877
Case TitlePAUL D. DOHERTY & others vs. TOWN OF ASHLAND & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date08/22/2008
Close Date10/17/2014

Parties

CounselNameType
Stephen W. Rider, EsquirePaul D. DohertyPlaintiff/Appellant
Stephen W. Rider, EsquireD&D Mulch and Landscape, Inc.Plaintiff/Appellant
Stephen W. Rider, EsquireNorth Country Mulch, Inc.Plaintiff/Appellant
Adam Simms, EsquireTown of AshlandDefendant/Appellee
Richard L. Neumeier, EsquireGeorge L. Richards, IIIDefendant/Appellee
Richard L. Neumeier, EsquireGoguen, McLaughlin, Richards & MDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
05/31/2013 #1 Entered.
05/31/2013 #2 Notice of entry sent.
06/10/2013 #3 Docketing Statement received from Paul D. Doherty, D&D Mulch and Landscape, Inc., North Country Mulch, Inc.^
07/10/2013 #4 SERVICE of brief & appendix (Vol 1-III) for Plaintiffs/Appellants Paul D. Doherty, D&D Mulch and Landscape, Inc. & North Country Mulch, Inc.
08/09/2013 #5 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Town of Ashland.
08/22/2013 #6 MOTION to extend reply brief due date, filed by Paul D. Doherty, D&D Mulch and Landscape, Inc., North Country Mulch, Inc
08/22/2013 #7 RE#5: Allowed to 8/30/13. *Notice.
08/30/2013 #8 SERVICE of reply briefs for Plaintiffs/Appellants Paul D. Doherty, D&D Mulch and Landscape, Inc., North Country Mulch, Inc.
10/11/2013 #9 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in December 2013
10/16/2013 #10 Letter of Adam Simms, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 12/4-12/13.
10/29/2013 Notice of 12/02/2013, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
12/02/2013 Oral argument held. (Rapoza, C.J., Berry, J., Trainor, J.).
12/19/2013 Letter pursuant to MRAP 16(l) filed by Town of Ashland@
09/19/2014 Decision: Rule 1:28 That portion of the judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' negligent misrepresentation claim is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. The judgment for the defendant on the regulatory taking claim is affirmed. (Rapoza, C.J., Berry & Trainor, JJ.). *Notice.
10/17/2014 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.