Court Case Record PAUL A. GARGANO vs. MICHAEL EMERSON & others 2013-P-0979

PAUL A. GARGANO vs. MICHAEL EMERSON & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-P-0979

Case Number2013-P-0979
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Field Date05/29/2009
Close Date03/28/2014


Paul A. GarganoPro Se Plaintiff/Appellant
Leonard A. Frisoli, EsquireMichael EmersonDefendant/Appellee
Leonard A. Frisoli, Esquire Edward M. Joyce, Jr., EsquireDaniel C. OrwigDefendant/Appellee
Benjamin F. Goodrich, Jr.Defendant/Appellee
Joseph J. Coppola, EsquireNatalie S. GoodrichDefendant/Appellee
Leonard A. Frisoli, EsquireHummock, LLCDefendant/Appellee
Irene DwyerDefendant/Appellee
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
06/24/2013 #1 Entered.
06/24/2013 #2 Notice of entry sent.
07/03/2013 #3 Memo: Notice of entry sent to David T. Barrat, Esquire returned as "not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward." Resent to address listed with BBO.
07/15/2013 #4 Letter from Attorney David T. Barrat re: request to place on inactive status.
07/17/2013 #5 RE#2: Treating the within as a motion to withdraw, it is allowed. *Notice.
08/07/2013 #6 Notice of change of address of Paul A. Gargano.
08/07/2013 #7 MOTION to stay, filed by Paul A. Gargano.
08/07/2013 #8 RE#4: The Clerk's Office has received the referenced document from Paul A. Gargano, who, according to the case docket, is represented by counsel. The document is noted as received on the docket, but the court will take no further action because it was not filed by counsel. Where counsel is on record as representing a party, only that counsel has authority to make filings in the court for the party, and only those filings will be reviewed and acted on by the court. Paul A. Gargano should direct future inquiries and requests to counsel who can then making appropriate filings. This notice will not be sent in the future in response to any subsequent submissions from Paul A. Gargano. *Notice/Paul A. Gargano.
08/29/2013 #9 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
09/12/2013 #10 Pro Se Motion to strike Attorney John Martin as counsel for the appellant, filed by Paul A. Gargano.
09/13/2013 #11 RE#5: In the event that Attorney John Martin is no longer representing Appellant Paul Gargano and Appellant wishes to proceed pro se, Attorney Martin is to file a Motion to Withdraw forthwith, indicating service of said motion on the Appellant at his current address. To date, Attorney Martin is listed as active counsel for the appellant. Appellant is granted an enlargement of time to 10-5-13 to file his brief and appendix. Notice to counsel and Paul A. Gargano.
10/03/2013 #12 Notice of pro se entry and dismissal of prior counsel John Martin, filed by Paul A. Gargano.
10/11/2013 #13 ORDER: DISMISSAL under Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
10/22/2013 #14 RE#6: The appeal is reinstated, and the appellant is deemed pro se. The appellant's brief and appendix are due on or before 11/5/13 (Grasso, J.). Notice
11/12/2013 #15 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
11/26/2013 #16 ORDER: DISMISSAL under Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
11/29/2013 #17 Letter from Paul A. Gargano re: Reconsideration and extension of time.
12/02/2013 #18 RE#7: The within is treated as a motion to reinstate the appeal and is allowed. The plaintiff shall file his brief and appendix on or before 12/16/13. (Hanlon, J.) *Notice.
12/11/2013 #19 MOTION to stay, filed by Paul A. Gargano.
12/13/2013 #20 RE#8: Denied without prejudice to renewal on or before 12/20/13 accompanied by a description of the grounds for seeking reconsideration and an explanation of why such a motion was required in light of the pending appeal. Further, the plaintiff should note that in a judgment subject to a pending appeal, leave of this Court is required before filing a motion for reconsideration or other Rule 60 motion. *Notice/Attest/Connors, J.
12/24/2013 #21 Request for stay of proceedings, filed by Paul A. Gargano.
12/30/2013 #22 RE#9: Appellate proceedings STAYED to 01/31/2014. Status report due 01/31/2014 as to the pending motion before the trial court. The plaintiff is granted leave to file and the trial court leave to consider such motion nunc pro tunc to the date of filing. *Notice/Attest.