seal

Court Case Record Oscar T. Brookins & another vs. Boston Zoning Board of Appeals & others 2011-J-0052 UID(b1d1)


Oscar T. Brookins & another vs. Boston Zoning Board of Appeals & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-J-0052


 
Case Number2011-J-0052
Case TitleOscar T. Brookins & another vs. Boston Zoning Board of Appeals & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date02/09/2011
Close Date02/14/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Oscar T. BrookinsPro Se Plaintiff/Respondent
Kathryn J. BrookinsPro Se Plaintiff/Respondent
Adam Cederbaum, EsquireBoston Zoning Board of AppealsDefendant
Boston Redevelopment AuthorityDefendant
Boston Society of Redemptorist FDefendant
Pontiac Associates, LLCDefendant
Kendra Kinscherf, EsquireMHB Realty, LLCOther/petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
02/09/2011 #1 PETITION pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by MHB Realty, LLC.
02/14/2011 #2 ORDER: The petitioner, MHB Realty, LLC, has filed a petition seeking review, pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118 (first par.), of an order entered by a Superior Court judge that denied the petitioner's motion to intervene as of right, filed pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 24(a). The judge's denial of the motion to intervene as of right is a final, immediately appealable order under the doctrine of present execution, and thus is not reviewable as an interlocutory order under G. L. c. 231, § 118 (first par.). See Attorney Gen'l v. Brockton Agric. Soc'y, 390 Mass. 431, 432-36 (1983); Mass. Fed. Teachers v. School Comm. Chelsea, 409 Mass. 203, 204-205 (1991). Accordingly, the petition must be denied because the subject orders are not interlocutory and the petitioner must pursue a plenary appeal by filing a notice of appeal in the trial court pursuant to Mass.R.App.P. 4(a). (Lenk, J.). Notice/attest/Giles, J./image