seal

Court Case Record NEWTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH & another vs. GARRETT SMITH & others 2018-J-0093 UID(b05e)


NEWTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH & another vs. GARRETT SMITH & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2018-J-0093


 
Case Number2018-J-0093
Case TitleNEWTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH & another vs. GARRETT SMITH & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date03/02/2018
Close Date03/06/2018

Parties

CounselNameType
Ezra David Geggel, Esquire Kathryn Harris, Esquire Robert Andrew Skinner, Esquire Vernon Thomas, EsquireNewton Presbyterian Church Plaintiff/Respondent
Ezra David Geggel, Esquire Kathryn Harris, Esquire Robert Andrew Skinner, Esquire Vernon Thomas, EsquirePresbytery of Boston Plaintiff/Respondent
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireGarrett Smith Defendant/Petitioner
Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Kelly Bradshaw, EsquireCarmen Aldinger Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireAnders Brownworth Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireThomas DeVol Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireHarold Jones Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireDoris Kellom Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireKristen Lucken Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireRoger Mark Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireRosslind Picard Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireDaniel Romaine Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireBeatrice Yankey Defendant/Petitioner
Kelly Bradshaw, Esquire Gary R. Greenberg, Esquire Zachary C. Kleinsasser, EsquireNewton Covenent Church Defendant/Petitioner
Ezra David Geggel, Esquire Kathryn Harris, Esquire Robert Andrew Skinner, Esquire Vernon Thomas, EsquirePresbyterian Church (USA) Defendant/Petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/02/2018 #1 Motion for stay under M.R.A.P. 6(a) with attachments, filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church.
03/02/2018 #2 Memorandum of law in support filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church. by Attorney Zachary C. Kleinsasser.
03/02/2018 #3 Record appendix Vol. I of IV filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church. by Attorney Zachary C. Kleinsasser.
03/02/2018 #4 Record appendix Vol. II of IV filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church. by Attorney Zachary C. Kleinsasser.
03/02/2018 #5 Record appendix Vol. III of IV filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church. by Attorney Zachary C. Kleinsasser.
03/02/2018 #6 Record appendix Vol. IV of IV filed by Garrett Smith, Carmen Aldinger, Anders Brownworth, Thomas DeVol, Harold Jones, Roger Mark, Rosslind Picard, Daniel Romaine, Beatrice Yankey, Newton Covenent Church. by Attorney Zachary C. Kleinsasser.
03/06/2018 RE#1: Based on a review of the record, including in particular the trial court's November 20, 2017 memorandum of decision and order on plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment and February 12, 2018 memorandum and order allowing plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, and the related papers filed by the parties in the trial court and the defendants in this court, the defendants have failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits warranting a stay of the judgment pending appeal. Accordingly, the motion is denied. (Agnes, J.). *Notice/Attest/Salinger, J.