seal

Court Case Record NETWORK SYSTEM ARCHITECTS CORPORATION vs. MICHAEL DIMITRUK & another 2012-P-1239 UID(58d0)


NETWORK SYSTEM ARCHITECTS CORPORATION vs. MICHAEL DIMITRUK & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-1239


 
Case Number2012-P-1239
Case TitleNETWORK SYSTEM ARCHITECTS CORPORATION vs. MICHAEL DIMITRUK & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date11/10/2006
Close Date06/12/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Richard L. Neumeier, EsquireNetwork System Architects CorporPlaintiff/Appellant
Mark D. Cahill, Esquire Lauren Lee, EsquireMichael DimitrukDefendant/Appellee
Mark D. Cahill, Esquire Lauren Lee, EsquireAccunet Solutions, Inc.Defendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/06/2012 #1 Entered.
08/06/2012 #2 Notice of entry sent.
08/20/2012 #3 Docketing Statement received from Network System Architects Corporation.
08/27/2012 #4 Copy of DAR application of Network System Architects Corporation.
09/18/2012 #5 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Network System Architects Corporation.
09/19/2012 #6 RE#3: Extension to 10/19/2012 granted for filing of brief of Network System Architects Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant. Notice to counsel.
09/19/2012 #7 OPPOSITION to paper #3, filed by Michael Dimitruk, & Accunet Solutions, Inc.
09/19/2012 #8 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to MRAP 19 (C), filed by Michael Dimitruk, & Accunet Solutions, Inc.
09/20/2012 #9 RE#5: The within is treated as Appellee's motion for reconsideration of this court's 9/19/12 action on paper #3, and after reconsideration, the action is to stand. Due consideration will be given to any request for an extension filed by appellees should such a motion be filed once appellant has filed its brief. *Notice.
09/27/2012 #10 DAR DENIED (on 09/27/2012).
10/17/2012 #11 SERVICE of brief & appendix 2 vol, (2 copies) trans for Plaintiff/Appellant Network System Architects Corporation.
11/16/2012 #12 SERVICE of brief for Defendants/Appellees Michael Dimitruk and Accunet Solutions, Inc.
11/28/2012 #13 Letter from Richard L. Neumeier re: Inclusion of supplemental appendix.
11/28/2012 RE#8: The within is treated as a motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix, and as such, it is allowed. The appellant's reply brief, Vol. IV of the record appendix (consisting of transcripts), and exhibit volume, are accepted for filing this date. Notice
11/28/2012 SERVICE of reply brief & supplemental appendix (1 vol, 7 sets labeled volume IV) for Plaintiff/Appellant Network System Architects Corporation.
01/14/2013 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in March 2013
01/15/2013 Letter of Mark D. Cahill, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 3/6-3/12, 3/18-3/20.
01/15/2013 Letter of Richard L. Neumeier, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 3/11-3/18.
02/01/2013 Notice of 03/05/2013, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
03/05/2013 Oral argument held. (Grainger, J., Brown, J., Rubin, J.).
05/15/2013 Decision: Rule 1:28 Judgment affirmed. (Grainger, Brown, Rubin, JJ.). *Notice.
06/12/2013 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.