seal

Court Case Record MIDDLESEX PROBATE FAMILY CT PROBATION DEPT & another vs. WALTER HICKS 2005-J-0014 UID(d0bd)


MIDDLESEX PROBATE FAMILY CT PROBATION DEPT & another vs. WALTER HICKS Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2005-J-0014


 
Case Number2005-J-0014
Case TitleMIDDLESEX PROBATE FAMILY CT PROBATION DEPT & another vs. WALTER HICKS
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex Probate & Fam
CourtMiddlesex Probate & Fam
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/13/2005
Close Date02/02/2005

Parties

CounselNameType
Middlesex Probate Family Ct Probation DeptPlaintiff/Respondent
Department of RevenuePlaintiff/Respondent
Miriam Goldstein Altman, EsquireWalter HicksDefendant/Petitioner
James Polin, Probation OfficerOther/respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/13/2005 #1 MOTION to waive entry fee, filed by Walter Hicks.
01/13/2005 #2 RE#1: Allowed as to the waiver of the filing fee only.
01/13/2005 #3 PETITION purs to GLc 231, s. 118 w/attach, filed by Walter Hicks.
01/19/2005 #4 RE#2 The judge's decision not to recuse himself does not, on the record before me, constitute an abuse of discretion warranting interlocutory relief. Accordingly, the petition is denied. (Lenk, J.) *Notice/attest/Rockett, J.
01/21/2005 #5 Motion to reconsider paper #2 filed by Walter Hicks.
01/26/2005 RE#3: The motion to reconsider is allowed. Upon reconsideration, the 1/19/05 action on #2 is to stand. (Lenk, J.) Notice
02/01/2005 Notice of appearance of Walter Hicks Pro Se.
02/01/2005 Notice of appeal filed by Walter Hicks.
02/02/2005 RE#5 The defendant's notice of appeal from the denial of his petition, filed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, s 118 (first par.), is hereby struck because there is no such right of appeal. See Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp., 399 Mass. 8, n.8 (1987); Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 614 (1980). (Duffly, J.)

Last Viewed