seal

Court Case Record MICHELE E. BRADY vs. JAMES J. BRADY 2012-J-0220 UID(d53e)


MICHELE E. BRADY vs. JAMES J. BRADY Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0220


 
Case Number2012-J-0220
Case TitleMICHELE E. BRADY vs. JAMES J. BRADY
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyWorcester Probate & Fam
CourtWorcester Probate & Fam
Court Address
Phone
Field Date06/13/2012
Close Date07/26/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
B.J. Krintzman, EsquireMichele E. BradyPlaintiff/Respondent
Lawrence F. Army, Jr., EsquireJames J. BradyDefendant/Petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
06/13/2012 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by James J. Brady.
06/13/2012 #2 ORDER: The Probate Court judge shall, on or before June 27, 2012, issue a memorandum explaining the rationale for paragraph 5 of the order dated May 14, 2012. Petitioner shall file a copy of the Probate Court judge's memorandum with the Appeals Court immediately after its issuance. (Wolohojian, J.) Notice/Attest.
07/02/2012 #3 Copy of Rationale on Paragraph 5 of Order dated May 14, 2012 (Meagher, J.), received from Attorney Lawrence F. Army, Jr.^
07/09/2012 #4 Reply memorandum to the rationale on Paragraph 5 of order dated May 14, 2012 dated June 26, 2012 filed by James J. Brady.^
07/09/2012 #5 Letter from Attorney B.J. Krintzman re: misrepresentation made by defendant. ^
07/16/2012 #6 Motion to strike from the record plaintiff's correspondence dated July 9, 2012, filed by James J. Brady. ^
07/17/2012 #7 RE#1: The defendant's petition is denied, no abuse of discretion having been shown in the motion judge's thoughtful balancing of various considerations in imposing limitations on the taking of discovery. For purposes of this decision, I have excluded from my consideration the last three sentences of the motion judge's Rationale dated June 26, 2012. I have also excluded from my consideration the plaintiff's counsel's letter dated July 9, 2012. However, I have considered the defendant's so-called Reply Memorandum dated July 3, 2012. (Wolohojian, J.). *Notice/attest/Meagher, J.
07/17/2012 RE#6: No action necessary. The letter has not been considered by the Single Justice (Wolohojian, J.). *Notice.
07/25/2012 Notice of appeal, filed by James J. Brady.
07/26/2012 RE#7: As there is no right of appeal from an order denying a petition for interlocutory relief filed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, s. 118 (first par.), the notice of appeal from the order of the single justice is hereby struck. See Gibbs v. Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp., 399 Mass. 8, 10, n. 8 (1987); Packaging Indus. Group. Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 614 (1980). (Carhart, J.) *Notice/Attest.