seal

Court Case Record MICHELE DAWN CIJKA vs. STANLEY MICHAEL CIJKA 2013-J-0316 UID(4d9e)


MICHELE DAWN CIJKA vs. STANLEY MICHAEL CIJKA Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0316


 
Case Number2013-J-0316
Case TitleMICHELE DAWN CIJKA vs. STANLEY MICHAEL CIJKA
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyHampden Probate & Family
CourtHampden Probate & Family
Court Address
Phone
Field Date07/26/2013
Close Date08/08/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Michele Dawn CijkaPro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner
Tahirah Amatul-Wadud, EsquireStanley Michael CijkaDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
07/26/2013 #1 ***Financial Statements IMPOUNDED***
07/26/2013 #2 Affidavit of Indigency, filed by Michele Dawn Cijka.
07/26/2013 #3 RE#1 ALLOWED FORTHWITH. The appellant's Affidavit of Indigency appears regular and complete on its face, and indicates that the appellant is indigent. The court hereby allows the Motion to Waive entry fee. Notice sent.
07/26/2013 Motion to docket appeal late, filed by Michele Dawn Cijka. ^
07/29/2013 RE#2: Plaintiff's motion to docket appeal late is denied without prejudice to renewal on or before 8/12/13 with a certificate of service compliant with MRAP 13(d) showing service on the defendant's counsel. (Carhart, J.). *Notice.
08/02/2013 Memo: Notice of paper #1 sent to Tahirah Amatul-Wadud, Esq. returned as attempted-not known, unable to forward. Resent to address list with Mass BBO.
08/02/2013 Letter from Michele Dawn Cijka re: Did not know time limit for filing. ^
08/07/2013 Memo: Notice RE#2 sent to Attorney Tahirah Amatul-Wadud returned as "not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward." Notice resent to address listed with BBO.
08/08/2013 RE#3: Allowed. The mother's appeal from the 12/21/13 judgment of the Probate and Family Court in HD10D0896DR is entered this date without further payment of fee as 2013-P-1263. The motion is allowed notwithstanding my concern that mother's notice of appeal appears to have been filed late without leave of court. If the notice is late, at it appears to be, and a motion for leave to file a late notice of appeal is not allowed by a judge of the Probate and Family Court or a single justice of this court before the case is assigned to a panel for decision, there is a substantial risk that the appeal will be dismissed. (Vuono, J.) *Notice/Attest.
08/08/2013 Memo: Case folder of 13-J-316 filed with 13-P-1263.