seal

Court Case Record MARSHALL FARMINGTON, LLC vs. MARKHAM METALS, INC. 2015-P-1640 UID(86a1)


MARSHALL FARMINGTON, LLC vs. MARKHAM METALS, INC. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2015-P-1640


 
Case Number2015-P-1640
Case TitleMARSHALL FARMINGTON, LLC vs. MARKHAM METALS, INC.
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date10/22/2013
Close Date02/12/2016

Parties

CounselNameType
David C. Aisenberg, EsquireMarshall Farmington, LLCPlaintiff/Appellant
William T. Appleyard, EsquireMarkham Metals, Inc.Defendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
12/07/2015 #1 Lower Court Assembly of the Record Package
12/07/2015 #2 Notice of entry sent.
12/11/2015 #3 Docketing Statement received from Marshall Farmington, LLC.^
12/18/2015 #4 Docketing Statement received from Markham Metals, Inc..^
01/08/2016 #5 Corporate disclosure statement filed for Marshall Farmington, LLC by David C. Aisenberg.
01/08/2016 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Marshall Farmington, LLC.
01/14/2016 #7 Motion to enlarge time for docketing appeal late, filed by Markham Metals, Inc.
01/14/2016 #8 RE#5: Allowed to 02/01/2016. Notice sent.
01/19/2016 #9 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Plaintiff/Appellant Marshall Farmington, LLC.
01/21/2016 #10 RE#6: Denied without prejudice to refiling including a statement as to one or more meritorious appellate issues, due on or before 1/28/16. See Tisei v. Bldg. Inspector of Marlborough, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 377, 378-379 (1975). *Notice.
01/21/2016 #11 Corporate disclosure statement filed for Markham Metals, Inc. by William T. Appleyard.
01/29/2016 ORDER: As appellee has not timely filed the statement ordered in the court's 1/21/16 action on paper #6, its check for $300 for the filing fee is hereby returned to appellee this date. *Notice
02/01/2016 Motion to enlarge time for refiling its motion to enlarge time for docketing appeal late, filed by Markham Metals, Inc..
02/01/2016 Motion to enlarge time for docketing appeal, filed by Markham Metals, Inc..
02/16/2016 RE#9: See action on paper #10. *Notice.
02/16/2016 RE#10: The defendant still has not addressed the deficiency in his previous motions, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal on or before 2/26/16. A statement of what the defendant is appealing from does not constitute a statement as to one or more meritorious appellate issues. See Tisei v. Building Inspector of Marlborough, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 377, 378-379 (1975). The check submitted by the defendant is returned to it this date. (Milkey, J.). *Notice.
02/12/2016 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Markham Metals, Inc.