seal

Court Case Record MARK D. STERN, P.C. vs. PETER ST. ONGE 2001-P-1709 UID(891e)


MARK D. STERN, P.C. vs. PETER ST. ONGE Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2001-P-1709


 
Case Number2001-P-1709
Case TitleMARK D. STERN, P.C. vs. PETER ST. ONGE
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySomerville District, MI
CourtSomerville District, MI
Court Address
Phone
Field Date06/05/2001
Close Date06/16/2003

Parties

CounselNameType
Mark D. Stern, EsquireMark D. Stern, P.C.Plaintiff/Appellant
Janet H. Pumphrey, EsquirePeter St. OngeDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
12/03/2001 #1 Entered.
12/17/2001 #2 Conference Project Participation Notice.
12/18/2001 #3 Findings of Heffernan, J. received from Somerville District Court.
12/26/2001 #4 Conference Statement submitted by Appellant.
01/02/2002 #5 Case returned from Conference Project.
01/02/2002 #6 Brief & Appendix now due 02/11/2002. Notice.
02/08/2002 #7 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Plaintiff/Appellant Mark D. Stern, P.C.. (1 vol. apdx.)
02/21/2002 #8 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Peter St. Onge.
02/21/2002 #9 Motion to dismiss, file a supplemental appendix and order appellant to turn over evidence if appeal not dismissed filed by Peter St.
02/21/2002 #10 Motion to file non-conforming brief filed by Peter St. Onge.
02/22/2002 #11 RE#8 Referred to the panel designated to decide the appeal. (Brown, J.) *Notice.
02/22/2002 #12 RE#9 The request to file a supplemental appendix is denied without prejudice to renewal indicating what exactly the appellee intends to include and whether it is part of the record on appeal. All other relief requested is denied. (Brown, J.) *Notice.
02/22/2002 #13 RE#10: The request to file a non-conforming brief is denied without prejudice to renewal with a copy of the brief the appellee intends to file. The request for an extension to the brief due date is allowed to 4/11/02. (Brown, J.) *Notice.
02/26/2002 #14 OPPOSITION to #8 & request for immediate review filed by Mark D. Stern, P.C..
02/26/2002 #15 RE#11: The appellant's opposition to the appellee's motion to dismiss is referred to the panel that will be designated to decide the appeal. The remaining relief requested is denied. (Brown, J.) *Notice.
02/27/2002 #16 Response to #11 filed by Peter St. Onge.
02/27/2002 #17 RE#12 The within is referred to the panel that will be designated to decide the appeal. (Brown, J.) *Notice.
03/12/2002 #18 Notice of appearance of Janet H. Pumphrey, Esquire for Peter St. Onge.
03/12/2002 #19 Motion to stay briefing schedule, filed by Peter St. Onge.
03/12/2002 #20 RE#14 Denied, as motions referred to the panel do not interfere with the briefing schedule. (Gelinas, J.). Notice.
04/10/2002 #21 MOTION to impound, filed by Peter St. Onge.
04/10/2002 #22 Motion for fees, double costs & sanctions filed by Peter St. Onge.