seal

Court Case Record MARIO LOZANO vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA 2014-P-0143 UID(0f32)


MARIO LOZANO vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2014-P-0143


 
Case Number2014-P-0143
Case TitleMARIO LOZANO vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date08/28/2012
Close Date05/07/2014

Parties

CounselNameType
Mario LozanoPro Se Plaintiff/Appellant
Kurt R. McHugh, Esquire Juliane Balliro, EsquireWells Fargo Bank, NADefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/31/2014 #1 Entered.
01/31/2014 #2 Notice of entry sent.
02/12/2014 #3 Motion to file motion for issuance of execution pursuant to Rule 70 in superior court for Wells Fargo Bank, NA received by email. Rejection email sent for the following reason: the case has not been assigned to a panel; a paper copy or copies must be filed with the court instead.
02/14/2014 #4 Motion for leave to file motion for issuance of execution pursuant to Rule 70 in Superior Court, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
02/18/2014 #5 RE#2: Allowed. Appellee may proceed in the trial court. Notice/attest
04/01/2014 #6 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
04/01/2014 #7 Motion to expand the record, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
04/02/2014 #8 RE#3: The first step in the court's standing order governing the dismissal of appeals for failure to prosecute is entered this date. *Notice.
04/02/2014 #9 RE#4: Denied without prejudice to refiling if necessary, as a supplemental appendix to appellee's brief should the appeal progress to that stage. Notice
04/04/2014 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
04/22/2014 ORDER: DISMISSAL under Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
04/24/2014 Letter from Mario Lozano re: formal complaint.
04/25/2014 RE#5: To the extent the plaintiff seeks relief from this Court, he must first successfully reinstate this appeal, which has been dismissed for failure to prosecute. *Notice.
05/07/2014 Notice of dismissal to Trial Court and parties: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
05/20/2014 Motion to reinstate the appeal, filed by Mario Lozano.
06/02/2014 RE#7: Appellee to file a response to appellant's motion to reinstate his appeal on or before 6/10/14. (Kantrowitz, J.). *Notice.
06/10/2014 OPPOSITION to paper #7, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
06/12/2014 RE#8: Appellant Lozano to file any response to paper #8 on or before June 23, 2014. (Kantrowitz, J.). *Notice.
06/24/2014 Response to paper #8, filed by Mario Lozano.
07/10/2014 RE#9: The plaintiff's motion to reinstate his appeal is denied. The plaintiff has established neither excusable neglect, nor a meritorious issue on appeal as required to reinstate this appeal. (Carhart, J.). *Notice/Attest.
09/09/2014 FAR DENIED (on 09/05/2014).