seal

Court Case Record MADELINE WHEET vs. THOMAS DEHNER, DIRECTOR 2012-P-0048 UID(a20e)


MADELINE WHEET vs. THOMAS DEHNER, DIRECTOR Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-0048


 
Case Number2012-P-0048
Case TitleMADELINE WHEET vs. THOMAS DEHNER, DIRECTOR
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/04/2010
Close Date11/21/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Matthew Paul Fitzsimmons, Esquire Matthew J. Dupuy, EsquireMadeline WheetPlaintiff/Appellant
Carolann Mitchell, Esquire Peter N. Downing, EsquireThomas Dehner, DirectorDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/13/2012 #1 Entered.
01/13/2012 #2 Notice of entry sent.
01/26/2012 #3 Notice of appearance of Peter N. Downing for Thomas Dehner, Director.
01/30/2012 #4 Docketing Statement received from Madeline Wheet.
02/23/2012 #5 SERVICE of brief & appendix (1 vol.) for Plaintiff/Appellant Madeline Wheet.
03/26/2012 #6 SERVICE of brief (7 & 1 original) for Defendant/Appellee Thomas Dehner, Director.
04/12/2012 #7 Motion for leave of court to file timely the Motion for leave to file additional appendix material, w/attached, filed by Madeline Wheet.
04/12/2012 #8 Motion for leave of court to file additional appendix material, filed by Madeline Wheet.
04/17/2012 #9 RE#7: Allowed for filing with the appellant's reply brief this date. *Notice.
04/17/2012 #10 RE#6: Allowed for filing this date. The attached table of contents will be inserted into appellant's reply brief as a courtesy. *Notice.
04/10/2012 #11 SERVICE of reply brief for Plaintiff/Appellant Madeline Wheet.
06/22/2012 #12 Notice of change of address of Matthew Paul Fitzsimmons, Esquire.
07/11/2012 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in September 2012
07/12/2012 Letter of Peter N. Downing, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 9/17, 9/25-9/28, 10/1-10/2.
07/31/2012 Notice of 09/12/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
09/12/2012 Oral argument held. (Cohen, J., Rubin, J., Carhart, J.).
10/24/2012 Decision: Rule 1:28 The judgment is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court with instructions that it be remanded to the agency for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court (Cohen, Rubin, Carhart, JJ.). *Notice.
11/21/2012 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.