seal

Court Case Record Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers vs. Stephen Thoener 2010-J-0360 UID(5815)


Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers vs. Stephen Thoener Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2010-J-0360


 
Case Number2010-J-0360
Case TitleLewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers vs. Stephen Thoener
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date08/05/2010
Close Date10/12/2010

Parties

CounselNameType
Christa von der Luft, EsquireLewis & Thos. Saltz ClothiersPlaintiff/Petitioner
Edward C. Cooley, EsquireStephen ThoenerDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/05/2010 #1 PETITION pursuant to G.L. c. 231, s. 118 with attach, filed by Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers, Inc.
08/05/2010 #2 Motion for stay of consideration of petition pursuant to G.L. c. 231, S 118, filed by Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers.
08/06/2010 #3 RE#2: Proceedings stayed to 9/6/10. Status report to be filed on or before that date regarding motion for reconsideration. *Notice.
09/03/2010 #4 Status report and motion for continuation of stay filed by Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers.
09/08/2010 #5 RE#3: Appellate proceedings stayed to 10/5/10. Status report due 10/5/10. *Notice.
10/04/2010 #6 Letter from Sarah P. Kelly re: Superior Court has recently denied the motion for reconsideration and the plaintiff now seeks review of that denial.
10/04/2010 PETITION purs to GLc 231, s. 118 w/attach, filed by Lewis & Thos. Saltz Clothiers.
10/12/2010 ORDER: "A request for a preliminary injunction is addressed to the discretion of the trial court judge, and a single justice will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion in the absence of a clear error of law or abuse of discretion. See Jet-Line Services, Inc. v. Board of Selectmen of Stoughton, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 645, 646 (1988). The petition and the materials submitted in support of it do not demonstrate that the Superior Court judge committed an error of law or abused her discretion in denying the requested injunction....Accordingly, the plaintiff's petition for interlocutory relief under G. L. c. 231, ยง 118, is denied." (Green, J.). Notice/attest/Roach, J./image