Court Case Record LORIE SPAULDING vs. BRANDY LAJOIE 2013-P-1344


Court Case Number: 2013-P-1344

Case Number2013-P-1344
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyHousing Ct, Worcester Cty
CourtHousing Ct, Worcester Cty
Court Address
Field Date08/29/2006
Close Date06/16/2014


Lawrence F. Army, Jr., EsquireLorie SpauldingPetitioner/Appellant
Michael James Shivick, EsquireBrandy LajoieDefendant/Appellee
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/23/2013 #1 Entered.
08/23/2013 #2 Notice of entry sent.
09/26/2013 #3 Docketing Statement received from Lorie Spaulding^
10/08/2013 #4 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
10/08/2013 #5 Notice of rejection of brief of Lorie Spaulding as noncompliant. The brief is too long. A conforming brief or motion to file a non-conforming brief is due on or before 10/16/13.
10/10/2013 #6 Motion to file a 51 page brief, filed by Lorie Spaulding
10/15/2013 #7 RE#4: Allowed and accepted for filing this date. Further, as it was entered in error, the notice preceding dismissal dated 10/8/13 is struck. (Grasso, J.). *Notice.
10/15/2013 #8 SERVICE of 7-briefs & 7-appendices (1 vol) & 2 transcripts (1 vol) for Petitioner/Appellant Lorie Spaulding.
11/12/2013 #9 MOTION to file supplemental appendix, filed by Brandy Lajoie.
11/12/2013 #10 RE#6: Allowed. *Notice.
11/12/2013 #11 SERVICE of 7-briefs & 7-supplemental (1 vol) appendices for Defendant/Appellee Brandy Lajoie.
01/10/2014 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in March 2014
01/14/2014 Letter of Lawrence F. Army, Jr., Esquire unavailable for oral argument 3/4, 3/10-3/14.
02/11/2014 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in April 2014
02/14/2014 Letter of Lawrence F. Army, Jr., Esquire unavailable for oral argument 4/1-4/4, 4/8-4/10.
03/04/2014 Notice of 04/07/2014, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
04/07/2014 Oral argument held. (Grasso, J., Green, J., Fecteau, J.).
05/19/2014 Decision: Rule 1:28 So much of the order, dated March 1, 2013, as concludes that Spaulding and her business entities are prohibited from engaging in the business of debt collection, including collection and judicial enforcement of judgment debt, unless licensed as a debt collector or undertaken through a duly licensed attorney, is affirmed. So much of the order as requires Spaulding to pay attorney's fees is reversed. The order is modified insofar as it directs the Clerk's office to cease accepting debt collection cases filed by Spaulding or her business entities by inserting the words "without prior judicial approval." The dismissal of the underlying judgment is vacated, and that judgment, which was entered on September 20, 2006, is reinstated (Grasso, Green & Fecteau, JJ.). *Notice.
06/16/2014 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.