seal

Court Case Record KIMBERLY RICHARD & another vs. JENNIFER HACKNEY & another 2013-J-0353 UID(f432)


KIMBERLY RICHARD & another vs. JENNIFER HACKNEY & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0353


 
Case Number2013-J-0353
Case TitleKIMBERLY RICHARD & another vs. JENNIFER HACKNEY & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyWorcester
CourtWorcester Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date08/19/2013
Close Date08/21/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Michael P. Welsh, EsquireKimberly RichardPlaintiff/Respondent
Michael P. Welsh, EsquireRonald RichardPlaintiff/Respondent
Isaac H. Peres, EsquireJennifer HackneyDefendant/Petitioner
Isaac H. Peres, EsquireMichelle RandolphDefendant/Petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/19/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by Jennifer Hackney & Michelle Randolph. ^
08/21/2013 RE#1: The defendants have filed a petition, pursuant to G.L. c. 231, § 118, (first para.), seeking review of an order entered by a Superior Court judge releasing funds paid by the defendants' insurance company to the plaintiffs. The petition is denied. Under G. L. c. 231, s. 118, first paragraph, a single justice reviews an order of the trial court for clear error of law or abuse of discretion. Aspinall v. Phillip Morris, Co., 442 Mass. 381, 390 (2004); Jet Line Services, Inc. v. Board of Selectmen of Stoughton, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 645, 646 (1988); Manfrates v. Lawrence Limited Partnership, 41 Mass. App. Ct. 409, 412 (1996). Here, the petitioners have not provided any authority to support their position and I have found none. As a result, after a careful review of the petition and supporting documentation, I discern no clear error of law and no abuse of discretion in the Superior Court's order. Consequently, the petition is denied. (Vuono, J.) *Notice/Attest.