seal

Court Case Record Jimena v. Sai Ho Wong et al. B261223


Jimena v. Sai Ho Wong et al. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: B261223


 
Case NumberB261223
Case TitleJimena v. Sai Ho Wong et al.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
County
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address2nd Appellate District
Phone
Field Date
Close Date7/13/2016

Parties

CounselNameType
Pro PerCarl L. JimenaPlaintiff and Appellant
John A. Peterson
Early, Maslach & Hartsuyker
700 S Flower St Ste 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Priscilla F. Slocum
Law Offices of Priscilla Slocum
1012 Katrina Court
Nipomo, CA 93444

Sai Ho WongDefendant and Respondent
Allan David Kellogg
Grobaty & Pitet
100 Bayview Circle Ste 210
Newport Beach, CA 92660

Michael J. Grobaty
Grobaty & Pitet
100 Bayview Circle
Suite 210
Newport Beach, CA 92660-2983

Sears Optical Co.Defendant and Respondent
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
01/09/2015 Notice of appeal lodged/received. 12/22/2014 Carl Jimena
01/09/2015 Filing fee. Money Gram #R204885794234
01/15/2015 Civil case information statement filed.
02/23/2015 Association of attorneys filed for: Priscilla Slocum associates in for respondent Sai Ho Wong
02/23/2015 Filing fee. check # 19376 for 390 for respondent Sai Ho Wong
02/23/2015 Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by: respondent Sai Ho Wong
05/06/2015 Record on appeal filed. C-2 (257 pages)
05/19/2015 Record imaged.
06/05/2015 Appellant's opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Carl L. Jimena Pro Per
06/25/2015 Granted - extension of time. Respondent's brief. Due on 07/30/2015 By 24 Day(s) Sai Ho Wong, Defendant and Respondent Priscilla F. Slocum, Associated counsel Ext RB (Wong) to 7/30/2015
06/29/2015 Opposition filed. Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time, filed by appellant Carl L. Jimena
07/27/2015 Granted - extension of time. Respondent's brief. Due on 08/17/2015 By 18 Day(s)
07/30/2015 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent's brief. Sears Optical Co.,
07/29/2015 Motion filed. by appellant Jimena opposing extension of time by respondent Wong & requesting reconsideration of the court.
08/04/2015 Order filed. Appellant's motion for reconsideration of the Court's ruling as to the granting of a second extension of time for respondent Wong to file his brief is denied.
08/13/2015 Respondent's brief. Defendant and Respondent: Sears Optical Co. Attorney: Allan David Kellogg
08/17/2015 Default notice for responsive filing fee sent to: respondent Sears Optical Co.
08/26/2015 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent's brief. Sai Ho Wong
08/28/2015 Appellant's reply brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Carl L. Jimena Pro Per
08/31/2015 Filed document entitled: Motion to Quash Notice of Default Sent to Attorney John Peterson Carl L. Jimena, Plaintiff and Appellant Pro Per
Disposition
Description: Affirmed in full
Date: 07/13/2016
Status: Final
Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
Author: Johnson, Jeffrey W.
Participants: Chaney, Victoria Gerrard (Concur) Rothschild, Frances (Concur)
Case Citation: none