seal

Court Case Record Jain v. RJT Compuquest, Inc. B271935 UID(d705)


Jain v. RJT Compuquest, Inc. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: B271935


 
Case NumberB271935
Case TitleJain v. RJT Compuquest, Inc.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address2nd Appellate District
Phone
Field Date
Close Date5/19/2017
Documentpdf

Parties

CounselNameType
Mythily Sivarajah
Adams | Nye | Becht | LLP
222 Kearny St 7th Fl
San Francisco, CA 94108

Michael B. Sachs
Adams Nye Becht LLP
222 Kearny Street
7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-4521

Anshul JainPlaintiff and Appellant
Mohammad N. Khan
Chugh, LLP
15925 Carmenita Road
Cerritos, CA 90703

RJT Compuquest, Inc.Defendant and Respondent
Phyllis W. Cheng
P.O. Box 4651
Valley Village, CA 91617

Phyllis ChengMediator
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
05/03/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Anshul Jain noa 4/28/16
05/07/2016 Filing fee. check # D3460635
05/13/2016 Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript. Reporter's transcript to be lodged with AOB
05/16/2016 Civil case information statement filed. voluntary dismissal originally received with the CIS. 7/12/2016 *the appealable order was submitted: Attorney fees/costs is granted in part/denied in part the attachment of the voluntary dismissal order submitted with the CIS was submitted in error and was not caught by appellant's sup. counsel until later in the appeal process. The filing of the appeal is perfected.
05/20/2016 Application filed to: by appellant to extend time to file Mandatory Docketing Statement to May 25, 2016.
05/23/2016 Order filed. Application by appellant to extend time to file Mandatory Docketing Statement to May 25, 2016 is granted.
07/06/2016 Letter sent to counsel re: The Voluntary Dismissal subm with the CIS on 5/16/2016 is NOT appealable. The appeal indicates appealing Order Granting In Part/Denying in Part Motion for Attorney Fees/Costs on March 1, 2016. If so, must serve/file conformed copy of 3/1/2016 order to perfect the appeal w/n 10 days of this letter.
07/01/2016 Filed letter from: from Attorney Mythily Sivarajah, for appellant re all parties agree to mediation.
07/07/2016 Requested - extension of time Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Requested for 09/13/2016 By 60 Day(s)
07/12/2016 Granted - extension of time. Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Due on 09/13/2016 By 60 Day(s)
07/12/2016 Filed document entitled: Cover letter by appellant's counsel: submitted appealable order Attorney fees and costs is granted in part/denied in part filed on 3/1/2016
08/16/2016 Settlement conference accepted. Calendar notice sent. 09/19/2016 at 10 a.m. at the court (Cheng)
09/13/2016 Appellant's opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Anshul Jain Attorney: Mythily Sivarajah
09/14/2016 Appellant's appendix filed. 2 volumes of appendices
09/13/2016 Reporter's transcript filed. hearing date February 29, 2016
09/19/2016 Settlement conference held. 10 a.m., at the court (Cheng) Mediator reported matter not settled
10/06/2016 Stipulation of extension of time filed to: Respondent's brief. Due on 12/13/2016 By 60 Day(s) ext rb 60 days
10/11/2016 Default notice for responsive filing fee sent to: Respondent
12/12/2016 Respondent's brief. Defendant and Respondent: RJT Compuquest, Inc. Attorney: Mohammad N. Khan
12/21/2016 Stipulation of extension of time filed to: Appellant's reply brief. Due on 03/06/2017 By 62 Day(s) ext arb 60 days
03/03/2017 Appellant's reply brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Anshul Jain Attorney: Mythily Sivarajah
03/03/2017 Case fully briefed.
Disposition
Description: Affirmed in full
Date: 05/19/2017
Disposition Type: Final
Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
Author: Manella, Nora M.
Participants: Epstein, Norman L. (Concur) Collins, Audrey B. (Concur)
Case Citation: none