seal

Court Case Record JUDITH INGALLS vs. RICHARD ALLEN 2011-P-1431 UID(95ae)


JUDITH INGALLS vs. RICHARD ALLEN Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-P-1431


 
Case Number2011-P-1431
Case TitleJUDITH INGALLS vs. RICHARD ALLEN
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyNorfolk Probate & Family
CourtNorfolk Probate & Family
Court Address
Phone
Field Date
Close Date09/26/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Patricia Saint James, EsquireJudith IngallsPlaintiff/Appellant
James R. McMahon, III, EsquireRichard AllenDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/16/2011 #1 Entered.
08/16/2011 #2 Notice of entry sent.
09/07/2011 #3 Docketing Statement received from Judith Ingalls.
09/07/2011 #4 IMPOUNDMENT NOTE: The parties' financial statements are impounded pursuant to Supplemental Rules of the Probate Court, Chapter XIV, Rule 401 (d).
09/16/2011 #5 Motion to enlarge time for filing brief to 11/15/2011, filed by Judith Ingalls.
11/15/2011 #6 SERVICE of brief (7) & 2 VOL. appendix and trans. for Plaintiff/Appellant Judith Ingalls.
12/16/2011 #7 MOTION to file supplemental appendix, filed by Richard Allen.
12/16/2011 #8 RE#5: Allowed. *Notice.
12/16/2011 #9 SERVICE of brief & supplemental appendix for Defendant/Appellee Richard Allen.
12/27/2011 #10 MOTION to extend reply brief due date, filed by Judith Ingalls.
12/27/2011 RE#7: Allowed for filing the reply brief on or before 1/18/2012. *Notice.
01/18/2012 SERVICE of reply brief for Plaintiff/Appellant Judith Ingalls.
03/08/2012 Notice of 04/10/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
04/10/2012 Oral argument held. (Kantrowitz, J., Kafker, J., Meade, J.).
07/13/2012 Decision: Rule 1:28 So much of the modification judgment as orders no child support and as directs each party to pay certain enumerated expenses of the children is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings with respect to child support. Unless the judge for good written reason decides otherwise, pending further proceedings and the entry of a new order, the existing order directing that the parties pay certain expenses of the children shall remain in place as a temporary order. In all other respects, the modification judgment is affirmed. (Kantrowitz, Kafker, Meade, JJ.). *Notice.
08/03/2012 Copy of FAR application of Richard Allen.
09/26/2012 FAR DENIED (on 09/11/2012).
09/26/2012 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.