seal

Court Case Record JOHN A. FEENEY & another vs. DELL INC FKA DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION & others 2011-J-0474 UID(db44)


JOHN A. FEENEY & another vs. DELL INC FKA DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-J-0474


 
Case Number2011-J-0474
Case TitleJOHN A. FEENEY & another vs. DELL INC FKA DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date11/03/2011
Close Date11/09/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Fredric L. Ellis, EsquireJohn A. FeeneyPlaintiff/Respondent
Fredric L. Ellis, Esquire John A. Shope, EsquireDedham Health and Athletic ComplPlaintiff/Respondent
John A. Shope, EsquireDell Inc fka Dell Computer CorpoDefendant
John A. Shope, EsquireDell Catalog Sales Limited PartnDefendant
John A. Shope, EsquireDell Marketing Limited PartnershDefendant
John A. Shope, EsquireQualxserv LLCDefendant
John A. Shope, EsquireBanctec IncDefendant
John A. Shope, Esquire Daniel J. Hammond, Assistant Attorney GeneralCommissioner RevenueDefendant/Petitioner
Benjamin Robbins, EsquireNew England Legal FoundationAmicus (defendant)
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
11/03/2011 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by Commissioner Revenue.
11/08/2011 #2 Motion to appear as amicus curiae in support of defendants' petition for leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to G. L. C. 231, 118, and statement of reasons why petition should be granted, filed by New England Legal Foundation.
11/09/2011 #3 RE#2: Allowed. Notice
11/09/2011 #4 ORDER: After review of the petition and the supporting materials, I conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, the defendants should be granted leave to take an interlocutory appeal from the order, entered on October 4, 2011, denying Defendants' Renewed Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award With Prejudice. Accordingly, I exercise my discretion to grant such relief, and the defendants may take an interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court judge's order of that date denying the renewed motion. See CUNA Mt. Ins. Socy. v. Attorney General, 380, Mass. 539, 540 (1980). The defendant shall file a notice of appeal in the Superior Court on or before November 25, 2011. Thereafter, the appeal shall proceed in the normal course. See Mass.R.A.P. 9(d) & 10(a)(1). Trial court proceedings shall be stayed pending resolution of the defendants' appeal. (Hanlon, J.) *Notice/Attest.
11/10/2011 Opposition to Petition with attachments, filed by John A. Feeney, Dedham Health and Athletic Complex.
11/21/2011 RE#4: The within is treated as a motion for reconsideration of the Order (P#3), dated 11/9/11, granting the defendants' request to take an interlocutory appeal from the order, entered on October 4, 2011, denying Defendants' Renewed Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award With Prejudice, and as such it is allowed. Upon reconsideration, however, the order granting said relief is to stand. (Hanlon, J.) *Notice.