seal

Court Case Record JAMES DICENSO vs. THOMAS VARGHESE & another 2012-J-0044 UID(9bf1)


JAMES DICENSO vs. THOMAS VARGHESE & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0044


 
Case Number2012-J-0044
Case TitleJAMES DICENSO vs. THOMAS VARGHESE & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date02/02/2012
Close Date02/06/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
James DiCensoPro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner
Peter L. Samek, Esquire John F. Strouse, Jr., Esquire Inactive David L. Valdina, Esquire Sylvia L. Szulkin, Esquire Philip H. Levine, EsquireThomas VargheseDefendant/Respondent
Peter L. Samek, Esquire John F. Strouse, Jr., Esquire David L. Valdina, Esquire Sylvia L. Szulkin, Esquire Philip H. Levine, EsquireDavid BoliverDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
02/02/2012 #1 Motion to file a late notice of appeal a single justice of the Appeal Court, for reconsideration for show cause and request for hearing before the Honorable Judge Robert Malcolm Graham on the merits of this motion, filed by James DiCenso.
02/06/2012 #2 Certificate of service received from James DiCenso.
02/06/2012 #3 RE#1: To the extent the plaintiff seeks leave to file notice of appeal late from a final judgment entered in 1988, the petition must be denied because more than one year has elapsed since that date. Consequently, the single justice is without authority to grant the relief requested. See Mass.R.A.P. 14(b) ("neither the appellate court nor the single justice may enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal beyond one year from the date of entry of the judgment or order sought to be reviewed"). (Agnes, J.). Notice/attest
02/13/2012 #4 Letter from James DiCenso, Pro Se re: response to paper #1 with attachments.^
02/13/2012 #5 Second letter from James DiCenso, Pro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner re: in response to paper #1.^
02/22/2012 #6 Response to court's notice dated 2-6-12 with modified copy of court's notice, filed by James DiCenso.
02/24/2012 #7 Misc materials received from James DiCenso.^
02/27/2012 #8 Memo: Notice of Paper #1 to Sylvia L. Szulkin, Esq. Returned unable to forward. BBO website states attorney Szulkin is retired. No additional information available.
02/29/2012 #9 RE#3: Treating the within as a motion for reconsideration of the court's action, dated 2/6/12, on P#1, and as such the action denying the plaintiff's motion to file a late notice of appeal is to stand. (Agnes, J.) *Notice.
02/29/2012 #10 RE#4: See court's action of this date on P#3. (Agnes, J.) *Notice.
02/29/2012 RE#5: See court's action of this date on P#3. (Agnes, J.) *Notice.
03/01/2012 Memo: Notice RE#1 sent to Attorney John F. Strouse, Jr. returned as "not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward." Notice not resent as he is no longer an active attorney.
03/01/2012 Memo: David L. Valdina Esquire returned as "not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward." Notice resent to updated address.
03/08/2012 Letter from James DiCenso re: Response to notices dated 2/6/12 & 2/29/12.
03/08/2012 Memo: Notice of paper no. 3, 4 & 5 for David L. Valdina, Esq. Attempted-Not known unable to forward. Re-sent to 1084 Parkway Lane Barefoot Bay, FL 32976.
03/08/2012 Memo: Notice of paper no. 3, 4 & 5 for John F. Strouse, Jr. returned as not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.
03/09/2012 RE#7: The within is treated as a motion for reconsideration of the actions of 2/29/12 and denied. (Agnes, J.). *Notice/Attest.
03/12/2012 Memo: Notice of #3, 4 & 5 sent to Sylvia L. Szulkin returned as attempted-not known/unable to forward. Not resent because Attorney Szulkin is not active.
03/16/2012 Letter from James DiCenso re: in response to action of paper #7.
03/19/2012 Memo: Notice of paper # 7 sent to Sylvia L. Szulkin returned as attempted-not known/unable to forward. Not resent because Attorney Szulkin is not active
03/20/2012 Letter from James DiCenso re: Violation of civil rights. ^
04/03/2012 Letter from Attorney James DiCenso re: Violation of civil rights.