seal

Court Case Record Glaude v. Tinsley et al. A149854 UID(323e)


Glaude v. Tinsley et al. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: A149854


 
Case NumberA149854
Case TitleGlaude v. Tinsley et al.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address1st Appellate District
Phone
Field Date11/15/2016
Close Date6/29/2018
Documentpdf

Parties

CounselNameType
Pro PerDonald GlaudePlaintiff and Appellant

Trinidad Theodore CruzPearson & Schachter1904 Olympic Blvd., Ste. 8Walnut Creek, CA94596
Robin Marie PearsonPearson & Schachter1904 Olympic Blvd., Ste. 8Walnut Creek, CA94596
Frederick TinsleyDefendant and Respondent

David Stanley BradshawJackson Lewis P.C.400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600Sacramento, CA95814
Evan Donald BeecherJackson Lewis P.C.400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600Sacramento, CA95814
Macy's, Inc.Defendant and Respondent

Kristina Lyn HillmanWeinberg Roger & Rosenfeld1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200Alameda, CA94501
Roberta D. PerkinsWeinberg Roger & Rosenfeld1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200Alameda, CA94501
IUOE Stationary Engineers Local 39Defendant and Respondent
Docket
Date Description Notes
11/21/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Filed 11/15/2016 by Donald Glaude, Plaintiff in Pro Per
11/21/2016 Notified parties of local rules and procedures.
11/21/2016 Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).
12/05/2016 Civil case information statement filed. Donald Glaude, appellant in pro per, without copy of judgment/order
12/07/2016 Default notice sent; no case information statement filed, or statement incomplete. copy of order/judgment needed
12/19/2016 Application for waiver of filing fee filed.
12/19/2016 Received: copy of Order Demurrer Sustained (p. 1) (to CCIS)
12/19/2016 Received: copy of Order Demurrer Sustained (p. 2) (to CCIS)
12/19/2016 Received: copy of Order Demurrer Sustained (p. 3) (to CCIS)
12/19/2016 Received: Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order (dated 9-23-16)(to CCIS)
12/19/2016 Received: Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order (dated 9-23-16)(to CCIS)
12/30/2016 Order waiving filing fee.
02/06/2017 Respondent's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 12/20/2016, designating CT with RT
02/06/2017 Respondent's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 12/30/2016, designating CT with RT
02/06/2017 Respondent's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 1/4/2017, designating CT with RT
02/06/2017 Default re: 8.130(b) rptrs fees not deposited rcvd. dtd. 2/1/2017
02/13/2017 Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 2/7/2016, designating CT without RT and an Administrative Record
05/09/2017 Record on appeal filed. CT-2 RT-2
06/21/2017 Received: (paper copies) Appellant's Opening Brief (missing table of authorities, cert. of word count, and POS showing service on Cal. Supreme)(to court for permission to file)
07/06/2017 Appellant's opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Donald Glaude Pro Per (was due 06/19/2017) (filed w/permission)
07/06/2017 Email sent to: Appellant D. Glaude, re: The court has granted permission to file your opening brief, and the brief was filed today, July 6, 2017. You will need to file a proof of service to your brief showing that four copies of the brief were served on the California Supreme Court as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.212(c)(2)(C). (See also rule 8.44(b)(1).) Additionally, your brief did not include a Certificate of Interested Entities (CIP) or Persons as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.208. I will be issuing a default notice to you today and you will have 15 days from the date of the notice to file the CIP. Failure to timely file the CIP may result in the brief being stricken and dismissal of the appeal. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.208(d)(3)(A).)
07/06/2017 Default appellant; no certificate of interested persons filed.
Disposition
***** *****
Description: Affirmed in full
Date: 06/29/2018
Disposition Type: Final The appeal from the trial court's order on Tinsley's demurrer is dismissed. The orders dismissing Macy's and the Union are affirmed. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
Author: Miller, Marla J.
Participants: Richman, James A. (Concur) Kline, J. Anthony (Concur)
Case Citation: none

Last Viewed