seal

Court Case Record GEORGE FORSYTHE vs. KATHERINE B. FORSYTHE & another 2010-P-1938 UID(43da)


GEORGE FORSYTHE vs. KATHERINE B. FORSYTHE & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2010-P-1938


 
Case Number2010-P-1938
Case TitleGEORGE FORSYTHE vs. KATHERINE B. FORSYTHE & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyNorfolk Probate & Family
CourtNorfolk Probate & Family
Court Address
Phone
Field Date06/01/2009
Close Date09/15/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Carmine L. Gentile, EsquireGeorge ForsythePlaintiff/Appellant
Janie Lanza Vowles, EsquireKatherine B. ForsytheDefendant/Appellee
John DoeDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
11/03/2010 #1 Entered.
11/03/2010 #2 Notice of entry sent.
12/13/2010 #3 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Plaintiff/Appellant George Forsythe.
01/04/2011 #4 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Katherine B. Forsythe.
01/31/2011 #4.1 MOTION to extend reply brief due date, filed by George Forsythe.
01/31/2011 #5 RE#4 Allowed. Appellant's reply brief is accepted for filing this date. Notice
01/31/2011 #6 SERVICE of reply brief for Plaintiff/Appellant George Forsythe.
02/01/2011 #7 MOTION to strike portion of appellant's reply brief, filed by Katherine B. Forsythe.
02/04/2011 #8 RE#5: Referred to the panel designated to decide this appeal. *Notice.
04/08/2011 Scheduled for submission to a panel without argument.
04/29/2011 Under consideration by Panel. (Rapoza, C.J., Kantrowitz, J., Rubin, J.).
06/29/2011 RE#5: (Revised Action) Denied (Rapoza, C.J., Kantrowitz, J., Rubin, J.). *Notice.
06/29/2011 Decision: Rule 1:28 The portion of the judgment dismissing the claim of lack of testamentary capacity is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. (Rapoza, C.J., Kantrowitz, Rubin, JJ.). *Notice.
07/12/2011 PETITION for Rehearing, filed by Katherine B. Forsythe.*@
07/18/2011 Copy of FAR application of Katherine B. Forsythe.*
08/18/2011 ORDER: The petition for rehearing filed by the appellee having been considered, it is ordered that the petition be, and the same hereby is, denied. (Rapoza, C.J., Kantrowitz & Rubin, JJ.) *Notice.
09/13/2011 FAR DENIED (on 09/09/2011).
09/15/2011 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.