Court Case Record GAIL PAPADOPOULOS & another vs. TARGET CORPORATION & another 2014-P-0565

GAIL PAPADOPOULOS & another vs. TARGET CORPORATION & another Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2014-P-0565

Case Number2014-P-0565
Case TitleGAIL PAPADOPOULOS & another vs. TARGET CORPORATION & another
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Field Date12/22/2005
Close Date05/15/2015


Emmanuel N. Papanickolas, EsquireGail PapadopoulosPlaintiff/Appellant
Emmanuel N. Papanickolas, EsquireIrene TsouvalasPlaintiff/Appellant
Sean J. Milano, Esquire James T. Scamby, EsquireTarget CorporationDefendant/Appellee
James T. Scamby, EsquireWeiss Landscaping Company, Inc.Defendant/Appellee
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
05/07/2014 #1 Transcripts received: 3 Vols 6/5/13, 6/6/13, 6/7/13 filed with brief of Gail Papadopoulos & Irene Tsouvalas. (See paper #5).
04/15/2014 #2 Entered.
04/15/2014 #3 Notice of entry sent.
04/17/2014 #4 Motion to waive additional entry fees, filed by Irene Tsouvalas.
04/17/2014 #5 RE#2: Allowed appeals of all plaintiff entered this date. *Notice.
04/22/2014 #6 Docketing Statement received from Gail Papadopoulos & Irene Tsouvalas. ^
05/08/2014 #7 Revised docket entries (certified; two copies) received from Suffolk Superior Court.
05/07/2014 #8 SERVICE of brief & appendix 1 vol, 5 exhibit appendix 1 vol, 2 transcripts 3 vols 6/5/13, 6/6/13, 6/7/13for Plaintiffs/Appellants Gail Papadopoulos & Irene Tsouvalas.
06/04/2014 #9 MOTION to extend brief due date of Target Corporation.
06/05/2014 #10 RE#6: Allowed to 07/07/2014. Notice sent.
07/07/2014 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Target Corporation.
11/12/2014 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in January 2015
11/19/2014 Letter of Emmanuel N. Papanickolas, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 1/12-1/16.
12/02/2014 Notice of 01/05/2015, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
01/05/2015 Oral argument held. (Rapoza, C.J., Cohen, J., Green, J.).
04/17/2015 Decision: Rule 1:28 The order allowing the defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is reversed and a new order is to enter denying the motion. The amended judgment on the jury's verdict is reinstated. (Rapoza, C.J., Cohen, Green, JJ.). *Notice.
05/15/2015 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.