seal

Court Case Record FLORENCE WALK & others vs. MYSTIC VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 2010-J-0483 UID(72ad)


FLORENCE WALK & others vs. MYSTIC VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2010-J-0483


 
Case Number2010-J-0483
Case TitleFLORENCE WALK & others vs. MYSTIC VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date10/22/2010
Close Date06/14/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireFlorence WalkPlaintiff/Respondent
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireEllen SeiferthPlaintiff/Respondent
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireDavid WalkPlaintiff/Respondent
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireJames H. RichPlaintiff/Respondent
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireBernard FriedmanPlaintiff/Respondent
George A. McLaughlin, III, EsquireWalk Rich & Friedman PartnershipPlaintiff/Respondent
Kenneth S. Leonetti, EsquireMystic Valley Development CommisDefendant/Petitioner
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
10/22/2010 #1 MOTION for stay under MRAP 6(A) w/attach, filed by Mystic Valley Development Commission.
10/22/2010 #2 ORDER: "The Emergency Application for Stay of Injunction and Contempt Order is allowed, and the Order Granting Second Post-Judgment Injunction, dated October 21, 2010, is stayed pending further decision by this court." (Green, J.) *Notice/attest/Curran, J.
10/26/2010 #3 Memo: The single justice case file in this matter is with 10-J-488.
10/29/2010 Letter from Joel E. Faller, Esquire re: Opposition due date for 10-J-488 and status report on Emergency Application for Stay of Injunction in 10-J-483 (see paper #2 in 10-J-488).
06/14/2012 RE#1: As the matters at issue in 10-J-483, 10-J-488, and 10-J-539, have been resolved by the appeals entered as 09-P-1591 and 10-P-2230, the petitions are hereby dismissed as moot. *Notice/Attest.