Court Case Record FASHIONHAUS, LLC vs. TESS & CARLOS, INC. & others 2013-J-0556 UID(f546)

FASHIONHAUS, LLC vs. TESS & CARLOS, INC. & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0556

Case Number2013-J-0556
Case TitleFASHIONHAUS, LLC vs. TESS & CARLOS, INC. & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Field Date12/18/2013
Close Date12/30/2013


M. Robert Queler, Esquire Harry C. Mezer, EsquireFashionhaus, LLCPlaintiff/Respondent
David C. Aisenberg, Esquire Leonard M. Krulewich, EsquireTess & Carlos, Inc.Defendant/Petitioner
David C. Aisenberg, EsquireT & C Main Street, Inc.Defendant/Petitioner
David C. Aisenberg, EsquireT & C Main, LLCDefendant/Petitioner
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
12/18/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by Tess & Carlos, Inc., T & C Main Street, Inc., & T & C Main, LLC.^
12/30/2013 #2 ORDER: After due consideration, this petition for review of the Superior Court order petitioner's motion for disqualification of respondent's attorney in the underlying action is denied. Petitioner correctly cites the general principles governing disqualification but has otherwise failed to proffer a persuasive or compelling argument that the application of those principles require disqualification in the particular circumstances of this case. The harm about which the petitioner complains exists, if at all, in the relationship between the respondent and its clients. Petitioner has not established its standing to assert that harm as a basis for the relief it seeks. Further, this court is unaware of any interpretation of Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.7(b) that requires disqualification of respondent's counsel of choice to facilitate petitioner's settlements options. (Hines, J.). *Notice/Attest/Henry, J.
12/30/2013 #3 Opposition to Petition with attachments, filed by Fashionhaus, LLC. ^