seal

Court Case Record ELAINE F. SANDMAN vs. QUINCY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 2012-P-1716 UID(b70e)


ELAINE F. SANDMAN vs. QUINCY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-1716


 
Case Number2012-P-1716
Case TitleELAINE F. SANDMAN vs. QUINCY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyNorfolk
CourtNorfolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date03/08/2012
Close Date04/03/2014

Parties

CounselNameType
Valeriano Diviacchi, EsquireElaine F. SandmanPlaintiff/Appellant
Anna Katherine Bennett, EsquireQuincy Mutual Fire Insurance ComDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
10/31/2012 #1 Entered.
10/31/2012 #2 Notice of entry sent.
11/08/2012 #3 Docketing Statement received from Elaine F. Sandman.^
11/21/2012 #4 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Elaine F. Sandman.
11/23/2012 #5 RE#3: Allowed to 01/15/13. Notice
01/15/2013 #6 SERVICE of brief & appendix-1 vol., 7 sets for Plaintiff/Appellant Elaine F. Sandman.
02/14/2013 #7 MOTION to file supplemental appendix, filed by Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company.
02/14/2013 #8 RE#5: Allowed. The appellee brief and supplement appendix are accepted this date. *Notice.
02/14/2013 #9 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company.
04/08/2013 #10 Notice of 04/30/2013, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
04/30/2013 #11 Oral argument held. (Rapoza, C.J., Hanlon, J., Maldonado, J.).
09/16/2013 #12 ORDER: The one-hundred and thirty day guideline for the above-entitled case is waived by order of the Court. (Rapoza, C.J., Hanlon & Maldonado, JJ.). *Notice.
11/14/2013 Decision: Rule 1:28 (Rapoza, C.J., Hanlon, Maldonado, JJ.). Judgment affirmed. *Notice.
12/02/2013 Motion to file petition for rehearing late, filed by Elaine F. Sandman.@
12/02/2013 PETITION for Rehearing, filed by Elaine F. Sandman.@
12/13/2013 Copy of FAR application of Elaine F. Sandman
01/10/2014 ORDER: The appellant's motion to file Petition for Rehearing late is allowed. The petition for rehearing filed by the appellant having been considered, it is ordered that said petition be, and is, hereby denied (Rapoza, C.J., Hanlon & Maldonado, JJ.) *Notice.
04/02/2014 FAR DENIED (on 04/02/2014).
04/03/2014 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.