seal

Court Case Record DR CYNTHIA J. MICHAUD INNARELLI & others vs. JEFFREY HARDIMAN & others 2013-J-0045 UID(7b7f)


DR CYNTHIA J. MICHAUD INNARELLI & others vs. JEFFREY HARDIMAN & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0045


 
Case Number2013-J-0045
Case TitleDR CYNTHIA J. MICHAUD INNARELLI & others vs. JEFFREY HARDIMAN & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyHampden
CourtHampden Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/28/2013
Close Date01/29/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
James W. Oliver, EsquireDr Cynthia J. Mi InnarelliPlaintiff/Respondent
James W. Oliver, EsquireCMI Associates LLCPlaintiff/Respondent
James W. Oliver, EsquireTrustee of Kelly-Foster Realty TrustPlaintiff/Respondent
Jeffrey L. McCormick, EsquireJeffrey HardimanDefendant/Petitioner
Bernard D. Posner, EsquireFrank TassoniDefendant
Michael A. Kelly, EsquireHallinan Capital CorporationDefendant
Michael A. Kelly, EsquireRgeional Financing Co LLCDefendant
Michael A. Kelly, EsquireJoseph GiuttariDefendant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/28/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by Jeffrey Hardiman.^
01/29/2013 RE#1: Defendant Hardiman's petition pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118 (1st para.) seeks review of an order issued by the Hampden Superior Court (Carey, J.) denying defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Count I of the complaint. The motion for summary judgment on Count I was first denied on October 30, 2012. Defendant Hardiman moved for reconsideration in the Superior Court on November 26, 2012, which was denied on December 28, 2012. The petition, which was not filed until January 28, 2013, is untimely under G.L. c. 231, § 118. See McGrath v. McGrath, 65 Mass. App. Ct. 670 (2006) (the filing, in the trial court, of a motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory order does not enlarge or create a new 30-day time period for bringing an appeal from the interlocutory order). Therefore, the petition must be dismissed. Moreover, even if timely, the petition seeks relief which a single justice has no authority to provide. See M.R.A.P. 15(c) ("a single justice may not dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or other proceeding"). (Katzmann, J.). Notice/attest/Carey, J.