seal

Court Case Record DEANNA C. MCCLOSKEY vs. MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY 2014-P-0568 UID(34f7)


DEANNA C. MCCLOSKEY vs. MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2014-P-0568


 
Case Number2014-P-0568
Case TitleDEANNA C. MCCLOSKEY vs. MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyEssex Probate & Family
CourtEssex Probate & Family
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/08/2009
Close Date05/19/2015

Parties

CounselNameType
Marc Fitzgerald, EsquireDeanna C. McCloskeyPlaintiff/Appellee
Robert E. Curtis, Jr., Esquire Melissa Sindeband, EsquireMichael McCloskeyDefendant/Appellant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
04/15/2014 #1 Memo: *** Financial Statement and GAL Report - Impounded ***
04/15/2014 #2 Entered.
04/15/2014 #3 Notice of entry sent.
04/18/2014 #4 Docketing Statement received from Michael McCloskey. ^
05/27/2014 #5 MOTION for stay under MRAP 6(a) with attachment, filed by Michael McCloskey.^
05/27/2014 #6 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Michael McCloskey.
05/29/2014 #7 RE#3: Denied without prejudice to refiling in the trial court as it does not appear that the motion was filed there in the first instance. See MRAP 6(a) (Kantrowitz, J.). *Notice.
06/02/2014 #8 Motion to reconsider paper #3, filed by Michael McCloskey.
06/06/2014 #9 RE#5: Upon reconsideration, the action on paper #3 stands. (Kantrowitz, J.). *Notice.
06/26/2014 #10 SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Deanna C. McCloskey.
06/27/2014 #11 MOTION for stay under MRAP 6(a) with attachment, filed by Michael McCloskey. ^
07/02/2014 #12 Response to paper #7, filed by Deanna C. McCloskey. ^
07/09/2014 #13 Reply memo in support of renewed motion for stay, filed by Michael McCloskey. ^
07/09/2014 #14 MOTION to extend reply brief due date, filed by Michael McCloskey.
07/09/2014 #15 MOTION to strike or redact bank records, filed by Michael McCloskey.
07/10/2014 #16 RE#7: Denied. Without addressing whether the father suffers irreparable harm during the pendency of this appeal when he is permitted by court order to have some visitation, the father has failed to establish a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits to justify the issuance of a preliminary injunction during the pendency of the appeal. However, neither party should anticipate any enlargements in the briefing schedule for this case so that a final decision may be reached sooner. (Carhart, J.) . *Notice/Attest.
07/10/2014 RE#8: See action on #7. *Notice.
07/11/2014 RE#10: Allowed to 7/18/14. *Notice.
07/18/2014 SERVICE of reply brief for Defendant/Appellant Michael McCloskey.
07/23/2014 RE#11: Allowed in part. On or before 8/6/14, the plaintiff/appellee shall file a copy of her opposition to the motion to stay identical to the paper filed on 7/2/14, except that the appellee shall redact the defendant/appellant bank account numbers. *Notice.
07/30/2014 Redacted replacement of paper #8, filed by Michael McCloskey.
09/11/2014 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in November 2014