seal

Court Case Record DAVID SCHER vs. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP & others 2012-J-0106 UID(6c64)


DAVID SCHER vs. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0106


 
Case Number2012-J-0106
Case TitleDAVID SCHER vs. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date03/16/2012
Close Date03/16/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
David ScherPro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner
Neil D. Raphael, Esquire Donald F. DeMayo, EsquireBAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDefendant/Respondent
Donald F. DeMayo, Esquire Neil D. Raphael, EsquireFederal National Mortgage Assoc.Defendant/Respondent
Donald F. DeMayo, EsquireOrlans Moran, LLCDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/16/2012 #1 Motion to waive entry fee, filed by David Scher, is allowed.
03/16/2012 #2 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by David Scher.
03/16/2012 #3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In this action, the plaintiff, appearing pro se, seeks to stave off eviction proceedings related to a foreclosure. In a petition for interlocutory relief filed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, first para., the plaintiff seeks review of various rulings by Superior Court judges declining to provide him the emergency relief he seeks.(1) Having reviewed the plaintiff's filings, I conclude that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any likely errors that warrant my intervention. To the contrary, the two Superior Court judges who have heard this matter seem to have bent over backwards to provide the plaintiff a full and complete hearing. In the end, the judges did not ignore the plaintiff's evidence and arguments; they simply did not credit them. *Notice/Attest/Kaplan, J. footnote: (1) Nominally, the plaintiff seeks review only of the denial of his last motion for reconsideration (and his petition would be timely only as to that motion). Given that there was little if anything new he raised in the motion for reconsideration, his petition could be denied on this grounds alone. However, given the underlying nature of the proceedings, I have examined the underlying merits.