Court Case Record DAVID J. HELFAND vs. RICHARD J. HELFAND & others 2013-J-0068 UID(369f)

DAVID J. HELFAND vs. RICHARD J. HELFAND & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0068

Case Number2013-J-0068
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyPlymouth Probate & Family
CourtPlymouth Probate & Family
Court Address
Field Date02/07/2013
Close Date02/26/2013


Donald J. Fleming, EsquireDavid J. HelfandPlaintiff/Petitioner
Richard J. HelfandPro Se Defendant/Respondent
Louise HelfandPro Se Defendant/Respondent
Denise A. Brogna, Esquire David J. Pellegrino, EsquireChase Home Finance, LLC.Defendant/Respondent
David J. Pellegrino, EsquireMortgage Electronic RegistrationDefendant/Respondent
Jay V. Lee, EsquireQuicken Loans, Inc.Defendant/Respondent
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
02/07/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by David J. Helfand. ^
02/07/2013 #2 Motion to file application for review that exceeds 5 pages, filed by David J. Helfand. ^
02/12/2013 #3 ORDER: As judgment has now entered as to all defendants in the trial court, plaintiff's proper avenue of review is by filing a notice of appeal in the trial court. To the extent plaintiff seeks a stay of judgment pending appeal, the request is denied without prejudice as the motion for stay ordinarily must first be filed in the trial court. See Mass.R.A.P 6(a). (Cohen, J.) *Notice/Attest/Boyle, J.
02/14/2013 #4 Copy of the plaintiff-applicant's Motion to amend Application for Interlocutory Relief, filed by David J. Helfand.
02/21/2013 #5 Motion to reconsider paper #3, filed by David J. Helfand.^
02/22/2013 #6 Memo: Notice of Order (paper #3) sent to Richard J. Helfand and Louise Helfand returned as "forward time expired." Notice resent to address on post office label.
02/26/2013 ORDER: The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is allowed. After review of the plaintiff's original and amended applications for interlocutory relief, I discern no clear error of law or abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court judge that would warrant intervention by the single justice. The petition is, accordingly, denied. (Cohen, J.). Notice/attest/Boyle, J.