seal

Court Case Record DAVID HENDREN vs. ALYSON LEE 2012-J-0481 UID(2c87)


DAVID HENDREN vs. ALYSON LEE Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0481


 
Case Number2012-J-0481
Case TitleDAVID HENDREN vs. ALYSON LEE
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex Probate & Fam
CourtMiddlesex Probate & Fam
Court Address
Phone
Field Date12/28/2012
Close Date01/23/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Carolyn Van Tine, EsquireDavid HendrenPlaintiff/Petitioner
Michael P. Friedman, EsquireAlyson LeeDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
12/28/2012 #1 Memo: *** Financial Statement & GAL Report - Impounded ***
12/28/2012 #2 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by David Hendren.
01/03/2013 #3 Motion to replace and destroy CD-Rom, filed by David Hendren.
01/08/2013 #4 Motion to enlarge the time within which she may file oppositions, filed by Alyson Lee.
01/08/2013 #5 RE#3: Allowed to 01/18/13 (Katzmann, J.). *Notice
01/10/2013 #6 Opposition to paper #3, filed by David Hendren. ^
01/14/2013 #7 Memorandum in Opposition to Petition with attachments, filed by Alyson Lee.
01/14/2013 Supplemental opposition to paper #3, filed by David Hendren.
01/23/2013 ORDER: Following divorce proceedings and a complaint for modification, Plaintiff seeks interlocutory review under G. L. c. 231, § 118 (first para.) of the second paragraph of a Middlesex Probate & Family Court (Kagan, J.) order issued on 11/28/12 following Mother's Motion for Allowance and Payment of Attorney Fees. In addition, Father has filed two motions to stay 11/28/12 orders of the Probate & Family Court: (1) pending his interlocutory appeal and (2) pending his appeal of a separate and final judgment. After review of all of the parties' submissions, no error of law or abuse of discretion below is apparent. Moreover, the judge's order was entered "[p]ending further order" and there are no exceptional circumstances presented here that would warrant single justice relief. For these same reasons, plaintiff has not demonstrated 2 entitlement to a stay from the single justice. Accordingly, all of the relief sought in all three single justice petitions is denied. So ordered. (Katzmann, J.). *Notice/Attest/Kagan, J.