seal

Court Case Record DAVID G. CHRISTENSEN vs. DANA S. THORNTON & others 2012-P-0946 UID(9d53)


DAVID G. CHRISTENSEN vs. DANA S. THORNTON & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-0946


 
Case Number2012-P-0946
Case TitleDAVID G. CHRISTENSEN vs. DANA S. THORNTON & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyDukes
CourtDukes Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/29/2007
Close Date07/30/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Daniel J. Larkosh, EsquireDavid G. ChristensenPlaintiff/Appellant
Scott Carroll, Esquire Curtis B. Dooling, EsquireDana S. ThorntonDefendant
David A. Barry, Esquire William F. Benson, EsquireDayton Electric Manufacturing CoDefendant/Appellee
David A. Barry, Esquire William F. Benson, EsquireEmerson Electric Co.Defendant/Appellee
David A. Barry, Esquire William F. Benson, EsquireW.W. Grainger, Inc.Defendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
06/11/2012 #1 Entered.
06/11/2012 #2 Notice of entry sent.
06/25/2012 #3 Docketing Statement received from David G. Christensen.
07/17/2012 #4 Motion to amend docket and for enlargement of time to serve and filed briefs, filed by David G. Christensen, & Dana S. Thornton.
07/19/2012 #5 RE#3:The docket shall be corrected to reflect the proper parties and their respective roles in this appeal. The motion to extend the due date of the appellant's brief and appendix is allowed, and the same shall be filed on or before 9/17/12. The motion to extend the due date of the appellees' brief is denied without prejudice to renewal by the appellees after the submission of the appellant's brief and appendix. Notice to counsel.
09/12/2012 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by David G. Christensen.
09/12/2012 #7 RE#4: Allowed to 10/09/12. Notice
10/01/2012 #8 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by David G. Christensen.
10/02/2012 #9 RE#5: Denied without prejudice to renewal accompanied by the appellant's brief and appendix. *Notice.
10/15/2012 #10 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by David G. Christensen.
10/16/2012 #11 RE#6: Allowed for filing this date. *Notice.
10/16/2012 #12 SERVICE of brief & appendix vol 1 & vol 2 is trans & exhibits for Plaintiff/Appellant David G. Christensen.
10/22/2012 #13 MOTION to extend brief due date of Dayton Electric Manufacturing Company, Emerson Electric Co., & W.W. Grainger, Inc.
10/23/2012 #14 RE#8: Allowed to 11/28/2012. *Notice to counsel.
11/28/2012 #15 SERVICE of briefs for Defendants/Appellees Dayton Electric Manufacturing Company, Emerson Electric Co. & W.W. Grainger, Inc..
01/14/2013 #16 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in March 2013
01/23/2013 Letter of David A. Barry, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 3/21-3/26.
01/30/2013 Notice of 03/04/2013, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
02/14/2013 NOTICE: The parties are notified that at the upcoming hearing, they should be prepared to discuss the jurisdictional issue of whether this appeal was timely filed. To the extent that the appellant seeks to rely on the filing of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict to toll the applicable appeal period (see Mass. R. App. P. 4(a); Stephens v. Global NAPS, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 676, 680 & n.6 (2007)), the appellant should be prepared to discuss whether the JNOV motion was "timely." See Mass. R. Civ. P. 50(b) and Superior Court Rules 9A and 26. (Berry, Si & Milkey, JJ.) *Notice.
03/04/2013 Copy of lower court judgment on Defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict filed at oral argument.
03/04/2013 Oral argument held. (Berry, J., Sikora, J., Milkey, J.).
06/03/2013 Decision: Rule 1:28 The two judgments dated April 19, 2011, are affirmed (Berry, Sikora, Milkey, JJ.). *Notice.