seal

Court Case Record DANA JILL GORDON vs. STEPHEN ANDREW PITNER 2012-P-0372 UID(bb62)


DANA JILL GORDON vs. STEPHEN ANDREW PITNER Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-0372


 
Case Number2012-P-0372
Case TitleDANA JILL GORDON vs. STEPHEN ANDREW PITNER
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex Probate & Fam
CourtMiddlesex Probate & Fam
Court Address
Phone
Field Date09/25/2009
Close Date05/10/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Alan S. Geismer, Jr., Esquire Alisa Hacker, EsquireDana Jill GordonPlaintiff/Appellee
Pamela J. Schaefer, EsquireStephen Andrew PitnerDefendant/Appellant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/06/2012 #1 Memo: ***Financial Statements Impounded***
03/06/2012 #2 Entered.
03/06/2012 #3 Notice of entry sent.
04/04/2012 #4 Docketing Statement received from Stephen Andrew Pitner.^
04/13/2012 #5 Motion for attorney's fees and costs, filed by Stephen Andrew Pitner.
04/13/2012 #6 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Stephen Andrew Pitner.
04/17/2012 #7 RE#3: Denied without prejudice to renewal pursuant to Fabre v. Walton, 441 Mass. 9, 10 (1994). See also Beal Bank, SSB v. Eurich, 448 Mass. 9, 12 (2006) (and cases cited.) *Notice.
04/26/2012 #8 MOTION to extend brief due date of Dana Jill Gordon.
04/27/2012 #9 RE#5: Denied without prejudice to renewal supported by an affidavit detailing specific good cause to warrant a 120-day extension. *Notice.
04/30/2012 #10 RENEWED MOTION to extend brief due date of Dana Jill Gordon.
05/03/2012 #11 RE#6: Extension to 09/11/2012 granted for filing of brief of Dana Jill Gordon, Plaintiff/Appellee. No further enlargement. Notice to counsel.
09/11/2012 SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Dana Jill Gordon.
09/11/2012 OPPOSITION to paper #3, filed by Dana Jill Gordon.
09/11/2012 RE#8: See action of 4/13/12 on paper no. 3. *Notice.
11/08/2012 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in January 2013
11/14/2012 Letter of Pamela J. Schaefer, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 1/18-1/22.
11/26/2012 Notice of 01/04/2013, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 (a4) sent.
01/04/2013 Oral argument held. (Fecteau, J., Hanlon, J., Sullivan, J.).
04/12/2013 Decision: Rule 1:28 So much of the order denying Pitner's motion under Mass.R.Dom.Rel.P. 59(e) as pertains to the parenting plan is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings on that issue consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. The order and the judgment are otherwise affirmed. (Fecteau, Hanlon, Sullivan, JJ.). *Notice.
05/10/2013 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.