seal

Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH vs. MARIO TINSLEY 2011-P-0353 UID(5351)


COMMONWEALTH vs. MARIO TINSLEY Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-P-0353


 
Case Number2011-P-0353
Case TitleCOMMONWEALTH vs. MARIO TINSLEY
Case TypeCriminal
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyHampden
CourtHampden Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date04/16/2009
Close Date06/19/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Jane Davidson Montori, A.D.A. Bethany C. Lynch, A.D.A.CommonwealthPlaintiff/Appellee
Sarah E. Dolven, EsquireMario TinsleyDefendant/Appellant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/03/2011 #1 Transcripts received: vols: 4; sets: 2 in Clerk's envelope.
03/03/2011 #2 Entered.
03/03/2011 #3 Notice of entry sent.
03/29/2011 #4 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Mario Tinsley.
03/29/2011 #5 RE#2: Allowed to 07/12/11. Notice
07/05/2011 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Mario Tinsley.
07/06/2011 #7 RE#3: Allowed to 8/12/11. Any further enlargement of time shall not be anticipated. *Notice to counsel.
08/12/2011 #8 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellant Mario Tinsley.
09/13/2011 #9 Motion to enlarge time for filing a brief to 12/2/11, filed by Commonwealth. Counsel is advised to make certain the docket number on filed papers is correct.
09/13/2011 #10 RE#5: Extension to 12/02/2011 granted for filing of brief of Commonwealth, Plaintiff/Appellee. Notice to counsel.
12/05/2011 Motion to file memorandum in lieu of brief and for summary disposition filed by Commonwealth.
12/13/2011 RE#6: The Commonwealth's memo filed in lieu of a brief is accepted for filing this date. The motion for summary disposition pursuant to Rule 1:28 is referred to the panel designated to decide the appeal (Cypher, J.). Notice
12/13/2011 SERVICE of memorandum in lieu of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Commonwealth.^
12/12/2011 SERVICE of reply brief for Defendant/Appellant Mario Tinsley.^
02/13/2012 Notice of 03/13/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
03/13/2012 Oral argument held. (Katzmann, J., Sikora, J., Agnes, J.).
05/22/2012 REVISED ACTION RE#6: No action necessary. (Katzmann, Sikora & Agnes, JJ.). *Notice.
05/22/2012 Decision: Rule 1:28 The order denying the motion to suppress is reversed and a new order is to enter allowing the motion. The judgment of conviction of possession is reversed, the finding is set aside, and judgment is to be entered for the defendant. (Katzmann, Sikora, Agnes, JJ.). *Notice.
06/19/2012 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.

Last Viewed