seal

Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH vs. LINDA HEAPS 2012-P-0131 UID(0030)


COMMONWEALTH vs. LINDA HEAPS Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-P-0131


 
Case Number2012-P-0131
Case TitleCOMMONWEALTH vs. LINDA HEAPS
Case TypeCriminal
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyFitchburg District, WO
CourtFitchburg District, WO
Court Address
Phone
Field Date01/19/2011
Close Date04/01/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Jane A. Sullivan, A.D.A. Susan M. Oftring, A.D.A.CommonwealthPlaintiff/Appellee
Edward Gauthier, EsquireLinda HeapsDefendant/Appellant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/30/2012 #1 Transcripts received: volumes: 1; sets: 3 sets paper and 1 set on CD ^ in Clerk's envelope.
01/30/2012 #2 Entered.
01/30/2012 #3 Notice of entry sent.
03/14/2012 #4 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellant Linda Heaps.
04/11/2012 #5 Notice of appearance of Susan M. Oftring for Commonwealth.
04/11/2012 #6 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
04/12/2012 #7 RE#5: Extension to 06/22/2012 granted for filing of brief of Commonwealth, Plaintiff/Appellee. Notice to counsel.
06/25/2012 #8 SERVICE of brief & supplemental appendix for Plaintiff/Appellee Commonwealth.
10/12/2012 #9 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in December 2012
10/12/2012 #10 Letter of Edward Gauthier, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 12/10,12/24.
10/19/2012 #11 Letter of Susan M. Oftring, A.D.A. unavailable for oral argument December 13th. (please note she has 3 other cases which received this notice 11P1661, 11P1696 and 11P1359 and request they not all be scheduled on the same date).
10/24/2012 #12 Notice of 12/03/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
11/02/2012 Notice of 12/07/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
12/10/2012 Letter from Edward Gauthier, Esquire re: unavailable from December 31, 2012 through January 11, 2013.^
12/07/2012 Oral argument held. (Green, J., Graham, J., Sullivan, J.).
01/29/2013 Decision: Rule 1:28 So much of the judgment as convicts the defendant of larceny from the person of a person sixty-five years of age or older is vacated and the finding is set aside; the remaining portion of the judgment, finding the defendant guilty of the lesser included offense of larceny, is affirmed; and the case is remanded to the District court for resentencing. (Green, Graham, Sullivan, JJ.). *Notice.
02/11/2013 Copy of FAR application of Linda Heaps.
03/29/2013 FAR DENIED (on 03/28/2013).
04/01/2013 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.