Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH vs. JANE NOE 2012-P-1855


Court Case Number: 2012-P-1855

Case Number2012-P-1855
Case TypeCriminal
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyIpswich District, ES
CourtIpswich District, ES
Court Address
Field Date03/15/2011
Close Date01/05/2015


Elin H. Graydon, A.D.A. Withdrawn Randall E. Ravitz, A.A.G.CommonwealthPlaintiff/Appellee
Patricia A. DeJuneas, EsquireJane NoeDefendant/Appellant
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
11/26/2012 #1 Entered.
11/26/2012 #2 Notice of entry sent.
12/04/2012 #3 Docketing Statement received from Jane Noe.^
01/09/2013 #4 Motion for leave to proceed under pseudonym , filed by Jane Noe.
01/09/2013 #5 Motion for leave to correct the docket to reflect defendant's pseudonym, filed by Jane Noe.
01/09/2013 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Jane Noe.
01/11/2013 #7 RE#4: Allowed for the reasons stated in the motion, and for the pendency of the appeal. Once a panel is assigned in this matter, the motion is to be referred to the panel. *Notice.^
01/11/2013 #8 RE#5: Allowed. The docket will be revised accordingly. *Notice.
01/11/2013 #9 RE#6: Allowed to 1/18/13. *Notice.
01/18/2013 #10 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Jane Noe.
02/27/2013 #11 Motion to remove undersigned as counsel of record for the Commonwealth, filed by Commonwealth.
03/19/2013 RE#8: Per the within, ADA Elin Graydon is allowed to withdraw. No brief is expected from the Commonwealth. AAG Randall Ravitz is added to the docket for notice purposes only on behalf of the Commonwealth. *Notice.
07/30/2013 Motion for panel assignment, filed by Jane Noe.
08/01/2013 RE#9: The matter will be assigned to a panel in due course. *Notice.
03/19/2014 Motion to preclude appellee from filing brief and for panel assignment, filed by Jane Noe.
03/21/2014 RE#10: The Commonwealth has indicated it is not filing a brief. The matter will be submitted to a panel in April 2014. *Notice.
04/15/2014 Under consideration by Panel. (Vuono, J., Meade, J., Carhart, J.).
12/05/2014 Decision: Rule 1:28 Order denying renewed motion to seal criminal record affirmed. (Vuono, Meade, Carhart, JJ.). *Notice.
01/05/2015 REVISED ACTION RE#4: Upon entry of the appeal, this court allowed the defendant's motion to use a pseudonym pending the outcome of her appeal. Given the court's decision on the merits, and the defendant's failure to seek further appellate review, the defendant's true name is included in the rescript transmitted to the District Court pursuant to Mass.R.A.P. 23, 367 Mass. 921 (1975). (Vuono, Meade & Carhart, JJ.). *Notice.
01/05/2015 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.